2012年5月29日 星期二

Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease

Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, Final Assessment CME

Paul Brown; Jean-Philippe Brandel; Takeshi Sato, MD; Yosikazu Nakamura, MD, MPH, FFPH; Jan MacKenzie; Robert G. Will, FRCP; Anna Ladogana; Maurizio Pocchiari, MD; Ellen W. Leschek, MD; Lawrence B. Schonberger, MD, MPH


CME Released: 05/16/2012; Valid for credit through 05/16/2013


Abstract and Introduction

Abstract

The era of iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) has nearly closed; only occasional cases with exceptionally long incubation periods are still appearing. The principal sources of these outbreaks are contaminated growth hormone (226 cases) and dura mater grafts (228 cases) derived from human cadavers with undiagnosed CJD infections; a small number of additional cases are caused by neurosurgical instrument contamination, corneal grafts, gonadotrophic hormone, and secondary infection with variant CJD transmitted by transfusion of blood products. No new sources of disease have been identified, and current practices, which combine improved recognition of potentially infected persons with new disinfection methods for fragile surgical instruments and biological products, should continue to minimize the risk for iatrogenic disease until a blood screening test for the detection of preclinical infection is validated for human use.


Introduction

The first case of what would eventually become a major outbreak of iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) was reported in 1974; the patient had received a corneal transplant from an infected cadaver.[1] In the years that followed, other sources of infection were identified: stereotactic electroencephalogram electrodes, neurosurgical instruments, cadaveric dura mater and pituitary glands, and, most recently, secondary variant CJD (vCJD) blood products. The ensemble of iatrogenic cases, including a bibliography of primary references, was last reviewed in 2006.[2] Today, after nearly 40 years of surveillance, the chronology and essential characteristics of iatrogenic CJD have been finalized, and the purpose of this article is to present these data along with a few brief comments about factors that determined the risk for infection and how future risks might be foreseen and avoided.


Figure 1. Annual incidence of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) caused by ingestion of meat products contaminated with bovine spongiform encephalopathy agent (A) and iatrogenic CJD caused by contaminated dura mater (B) and cadaveric human growth hormone (C), 1982–2011. White bars in panel A represent cases from outside the United Kingdom, which were delayed in parallel with the later appearance of bovine spongiform encephalopathy outside the United Kingdom (not a second wave resulting from codon 129 genotype differences). Two patients are excluded: 1 presymptomatic patient from the United States who received human growth hormone and died of an intercurrent illness and 1 dura mater recipient from the United Kingdom with disease onset in 1978.



By far the most common sources of iatrogenic disease were human cadavers from which pituitary hormones and dura mater grafts were obtained ( Table 1 ; Figure 1); the other major variety of environmentally acquired disease is vCJD. The incidence curves of human growth hormone–associated and dura mater–associated CJD are almost superimposable; a broad peak occurred in the mid-to-late 1990s, just ahead of the sharper peak incidence of vCJD in the United Kingdom at the turn of the century. The incidence in other countries peaked a few years later, in 2004, as a result of the delayed appearance of bovine spongiform encephalopathy in those countries.


Table 1. Global distribution of cases of iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease*

Country Source of infection and no. cases Surgical procedure Medical procedure Dura mater grafts Surgical instruments EEG needles Corneal transplants† Growth hormone‡ Gonadotropin Packed red blood cells§
Argentina1
Australia5 4
Austria3 1
Brazil 2
Canada4
Croatia1
France131 119
Germany10 1
Ireland 1
Italy9
Japan142
Netherlands5 2
New Zealand2 6
South Korea2
Qatar 1
South Africa1
Spain14
Switzerland3 2
Thailand1
United Kingdom83 65 3
United States4 129
Total22842222643


*EEG, electroencephalogram.
†Additional possible single cases after corneal transplant or keratoplasty (not included in table) in Japan, United Kingdom, and United States.

‡Human growth hormone given in Brazil and New Zealand was prepared in the United States; that given in Qatar was prepared in France. Additional possible single cases with human growth hormone as source (not included in table) occurred in Sweden, Australia, and New Zealand.

§An additional asymptomatic but infected red-cell recipient died of an unrelated illness; another asymptomatic infected hemophilia patient who had been exposed to potentially contaminated factor VIII also died of an unrelated illness (neither is included in the table).


The long incubation periods—years to decades—of these low-dose infections pose a particularly difficult problem for public health officials, whose recommendations may diminish the number of new cases but are impotent when it comes to preventing cases in already-infected persons in the preclinical phase of disease. It is worth remembering that the early recognition of iatrogenic sources of CJD was entirely because of a few remarkably astute neurologists, neurosurgeons, and, astonishingly, a pediatric endocrinologist who pursued the unlikely (and unpopular) diagnosis of CJD in a growth hormone recipient.[3] It is true that some of these connections had the benefit of comparatively short intervals between the infecting events and the onset of CJD. It is especially fortunate from the standpoint of early recognition of the dura mater association that the interval of 19 months between the operation and onset of symptoms in the first case-patient was among the shortest on record for this form of iatrogenic CJD ( Table 2 ).


Table 2. Incubation periods and clinical presentations of iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, according to source of infection*

Source of Infection No. cases Mean incubation period, y (range) Clinical signs†
Dura mater graft22812 (1.3–30)Cerebellar, visual, dementia
Neurosurgical instruments41.4 (1–2.3)Visual, dementia, cerebellar
Stereotactic EEG needles21.3, 1.7Dementia, cerebellar
Corneal transplant21.5, 27Dementia, cerebellar
Growth hormone22617 (5–42)‡Cerebellar
Gonadotropin413.5 (12–16)Cerebellar
Packed red blood cells§36.5, 7.8, 8.3Psychiatric, sensory, dementia, cerebellar


*EEG, electroencephalogram.
†In order of decreasing frequency.

‡Averages and ranges were 13 (5–24) y in France; 20 (7–39) y in the United Kingdom; and 22 (10–42) y in the United States.

§An additional asymptomatic but infected red-cell recipient died of an unrelated illness; another asymptomatic infected hemophilia patient who had been exposed to potentially contaminated factor VIII also died of an unrelated illness (neither is included in the table).


Human Growth Hormone

The current worldwide total of growth hormone–associated cases of CJD is 226. Most cases occurred in France (119 cases/1,880 recipients; attack rate 6.3%), the United Kingdom (65 cases/1,800 recipients; attack rate 3.6%), and the United States (29 cases/7,700 recipients; attack rate 0.4%).


In France, further epidemiologic observations have revealed that all 119 cases occurred within a 1,170-patient cohort receiving treatment during a 20-month period, from December 1983 through July 1985, when there seems to have been substantial contamination resulting from sourcing and processing deficiencies. According to these numbers, the attack rate for the at-risk cohort in France increases to 10.2%. No new case has been identified since 2008. In the United Kingdom, no cohort pattern is evident, and cases continue to occur at an average rate of about 2 per year (only 1 in 2011). In the United States, CJD has not occurred in any patient who started treatment after 1977, when a highly selective column chromatography step was introduced into the purification protocol. Since 2003, only 2 new cases have been identified (1 in 2007 and 1 in 2009). An estimated ≈2,700 patients received treatment before 1977, so the attack rate in the United States for this at-risk cohort increases to 1.1%.[4] The revised attack rates therefore become 10.2% in France, 3.6% in the United Kingdom, and 1.1% in the United States.


The methionine (M)/valine polymorphism at codon 129 of the PRNP gene has been examined in populations with and without CJD in many countries; results have varied (Table 3). Overall, it is clear that the M allele bestows substantial susceptibility to the sporadic and the iatrogenic forms of CJD; in consequence, the proportion of persons with MM homozygous genotype is overrepresented in both categories of disease (the sole exception occurred in UK growth hormone recipients, which led to speculation that a different strain of the pathogenic agent might have been disseminated).[10] It is also clear that, as a group, persons with heterozygous genotype had longer incubation periods than did those with homozygous genotype, particularly in France. Notwithstanding this statistical conclusion, it is noteworthy that several persons with MM homozygous genotype had incubation periods >30 years, including a patient with recently diagnosed CJD, whose incubation period was 42 years, the current world record for any type of iatrogenic disease.


Table 3. Comparison of PRNP codon 129 genotype frequencies and incubation periods in growth hormone– and dura mater–associated cases of iatrogenic CJD*

Category MM VV Homozygotes Heterozygotes
Population
Healthy Caucasian, %†40105050
European, with sporadic CJD, %67178416
Healthy Japanese, %920928
Japanese, with sporadic CJD, (%)971982
Infection source
Growth hormone
France (111)
Genotype frequency, %54156931
Incubation period, y1291117
United Kingdom (28)
Genotype frequency, %4505446
Incubation period, y21182023
United States (11)
Genotype frequency, %55187327
Incubation period, y21182023
Combined total (150)
Genotype frequency, %45226733
Incubation period, y13121317
Dura mater
Japan (54)‡
Genotype frequency, %960964
Incubation period, y16NA1613
Countries other than Japan (54)§
Genotype frequency, %65158020
Incubation period, y12121216
Combined total (108)
Genotype frequency, %8178812
Incubation period, y14121416


*CJD, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; M, methionine; V, valine; NA, not applicable. All values are rounded to the nearest whole number.

†Based on several large-scale population studies5-9.

‡Personal communication from M. Yamama, Department of Neurology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
§Cases from France (11), Spain (11), Germany (10), Italy (8), the Netherlands (5), and 1 or 2 cases from each of 6 other countries with Caucasian populations.


Incubation periods for the total case population (not just those examined for the codon 129 genotype) ranged from 5 to 42 years (mean 17 years), based on the interval between the midpoint date of what was almost always a multiyear period of treatment and the onset of CJD symptoms; the actual date of infection is impossible to determine. Mean incubation periods for cases in the United States and New Zealand (patients received hormone made in the United States) were 22 and 26 years; United Kingdom, 20 years; and France, 13 years. The shorter incubation periods in France could have resulted partly from the narrower limit for the date of infection in France and are in accord with the mean incubation period of 13.5 years in the 4 gonadotropin recipients from Australia, for whom there is an even more precise date of infection. However, a greater contribution probably came from different infectious doses received by patients in the different countries. Among all patients, the clinical features were distinctive in that, unlike sporadic CJD, signs and symptoms almost never included dementia, which, if it occurred at all, was typically a late component of the clinical course.


Dura Mater

The worldwide tally of dura mater–associated cases is 228, and new cases still continue to occur here and there, the most recent being individual cases in Austria, South Korea, and the Netherlands in 2011. If the pharmaceutical industry (in contrast to government-sponsored laboratories) comes away from the growth hormone story with an almost untainted record—only 1 case has been attributed to industrially prepared hormone[11]—the same cannot be said about the private sector producing dura mater grafts. The source of almost all infections was a manufacturer in Germany, B. Braun Melsungen AG, which has a worldwide distribution network, and the incidence of CJD appears to have more or less paralleled the frequency with which this source of dura mater was used. In Japan, it is estimated that as many as 20,000 patches may have been used each year, and the 142 cases in that country constitute two thirds of the global total. Nevertheless, the overall attack rate in the at-risk patient population in Japan is <0.03%. For the entire (worldwide) group of dura mater–recipient patients, incubation periods ranged from 1.3 to 30 years (mean 12 years), and, except in Japan, the clinical and neuropathologic features were similar to those of sporadic CJD. In Japan, approximately one third of the cases had atypical features (slow progression, noncharacteristic electroencephalogram tracings, plaque deposition, and an atypical prion protein molecular signature on Western blots), which suggested the possibility of 2 different strains of infecting agent.[12,13] One patient had florid plaques and a pulvinar sign on magnetic resonance imaging, mimicking vCJD.[5]


Evaluation of the influence of the codon 129 genotype is complicated by the fact that the population in Japan, among whom most cases occurred, has a high frequency of the M allele (>90%), which dominated sporadic and dura mater–associated forms of CJD ( Table 3 ).[6–9,14,15] Among the cases in persons not from Japan, the distribution of genotypes approximated that found among patients with sporadic CJD, and, as with growth hormone–associated cases, incubation periods were somewhat longer for persons with heterozygous than with homozygous genotypes.


Table 3. Comparison of PRNP codon 129 genotype frequencies and incubation periods in growth hormone– and dura mater–associated cases of iatrogenic CJD*

Category MM VV Homozygotes Heterozygotes
Population
Healthy Caucasian, %†40105050
European, with sporadic CJD, %67178416
Healthy Japanese, %920928
Japanese, with sporadic CJD, (%)971982
Infection source
Growth hormone
France (111)
Genotype frequency, %54156931
Incubation period, y1291117
United Kingdom (28)
Genotype frequency, %4505446
Incubation period, y21182023
United States (11)
Genotype frequency, %55187327
Incubation period, y21182023
Combined total (150)
Genotype frequency, %45226733
Incubation period, y13121317
Dura mater
Japan (54)‡
Genotype frequency, %960964
Incubation period, y16NA1613
Countries other than Japan (54)§
Genotype frequency, %65158020
Incubation period, y12121216
Combined total (108)
Genotype frequency, %8178812
Incubation period, y14121416


*CJD, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; M, methionine; V, valine; NA, not applicable. All values are rounded to the nearest whole number.

†Based on several large-scale population studies5-9.

‡Personal communication from M. Yamama, Department of Neurology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
§Cases from France (11), Spain (11), Germany (10), Italy (8), the Netherlands (5), and 1 or 2 cases from each of 6 other countries with Caucasian populations.



Current Prevention Strategies

The best way to abolish secondary iatrogenic infections is, obviously, to prevent primary infections, but without a test to identify infected but asymptomatic persons, we cannot entirely eliminate the risk inherent in human-to-human tissue transfer. We are therefore obliged to rely on the default strategies of 1) identification and donor deferral of persons at higher than normal risk for CJD development and 2) inclusion of prion-reduction steps in the sterilization of penetrating instruments and the processing of therapeutic tissues and fluids.


Delineation of high-risk categories initially focused on precisely those groups of persons who were exposed to the known sources of iatrogenic disease: recipients of cadaveric dura mater grafts or pituitary-derived hormones. When vCJD started to occur, restrictions were also placed on donor time of residence in the most heavily infected regions—the United Kingdom and, to a lesser extent, continental Europe—and embargoes were placed on the importation of biological products from these regions. These deferral and import restrictions remain in place today and need some thoughtful reevaluation in view of the near extinction of all such sources of iatrogenic CJD. In the United States, there have been only 4 cases of dura mater–associated disease (the most recent in 2005) and no case of growth hormone–associated CJD for anyone who began treatment after 1977.


On the other hand, the possibility of iatrogenic infection resulting from transfer of tissues or fluids from persons who have contracted a prion disease from animals has not disappeared with the abating epidemics of bovine spongiform encephalopathy and vCJD. A few persons who may be experiencing a long incubation phase of vCJD still pose an obvious danger in the United Kingdom, but an underappreciated potential danger lies in 2 other animal diseases: scrapie and chronic wasting disease (CWD). Although scrapie-infected sheep tissues have been consumed for long enough (hundreds of years) to be considered harmless for humans, the same cannot be said about the atypical strains of scrapie that are beginning to displace the typical strains and with which we do not yet have enough experience to evaluate human pathogenicity. Similarly, we cannot declare with certainty that CWD poses no threat to humans, and CWD is continuing its unchecked spread across the United States and Canada with no guarantee that it will not become globally distributed in the years to come. One hunter has already put a group of unwitting persons at risk for infection by donating a deer, later found to have CWD, for consumption at a rural banquet in New York State;[16] more such exposures are likely to occur as CWD continues its geographic expansion.


Future Prevention Strategies

The issue of reducing risk by taking steps to inactivate prions is always a work in progress as new therapeutic products come into production and new methods to inactivate prions are discovered. The tried-and-true laboratory method of prion sterilization (1-hour exposures to either undiluted bleach or 1 N sodium hydroxide followed by steam autoclaving at 3 atmospheres pressure for 20 minutes) is applicable only to nonfragile instruments and not at all to living tissues. The surprising resistance of dura mater to 0.1 N sodium hydroxide[17] and of growth hormone to 6 M urea[18] led to their incorporation into processing protocols before being replaced by nondural tissue or synthetic patches and recombinant hormone. To reduce infectivity, blood, blood products, and other fluids can be subjected to nanofiltration and prion-affinity ligands,[19–22] which should also be applicable to other biological products, for example, vaccine and stem cell cultures, should they be susceptible to infection.[23] Fragile instruments such as endoscopes and electrodes remain a challenge, but new and gentler methods— alkaline cleaning solutions, phenolics, and gaseous hydrogen peroxide—have proven harmless to instruments and give a high, if not always complete, degree of prion inactivation.[24–26]


The ongoing refinement of a quaking-induced conversion detection of the misfolded prion protein holds the best prospect of evolving into a sensitive and practical tool, but it has yet to be validated in blind testing of plasma from symptomatic patients or in presymptomatic persons, even more rigorous but necessary.[27,28] It may be necessary to use scrapie-infected animals for presymptomatic validation because only 1 group of humans could furnish appropriate samples—asymptomatic carriers of CJD-inducing mutations—and putting together and testing a reasonable number of such samples will take years to accomplish.


The total numbers of cases for the 2 major causes of iatrogenic CJD during the past 40 years (226 growth hormone cases and 228 dura mater cases) are amazingly close and are likely to remain so after the few additional long-incubating cases finally surface in the next few years. The combination of appropriate blood donor deferrals and the incorporation of tissue, fluid, and instrument infectivity–reduction steps should continue to hold the sources of potential iatrogenic disease to a minimum until such time as a practical screening test for inapparent infection is validated for human use.


This article is a CME certified activity. To earn credit for this activity visit:
http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/763549


References

  1. Duffy P, Wolf J, Collins G, DeVoe AB, Streeten B, Cowen D. Letter: possible person-to-person transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. N Engl J Med. 1974;290:692–3. 10.1056/NEJM1974032129012204591849
  2. Brown P, Brandel J-P, Preece M, Sato T. Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: the waning of an era. Neurology. 2006;67:389–93. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000231528.65069.3f16855204
  3. Brown P. Human growth hormone therapy and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a drama in three acts. Pediatrics. 1988;81:85–92.3275936
  4. Abrams JY, Schonberger LB, Belay ED, Maddox RA, Leschek EW, Mills JL, et al. Lower risk of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in pituitary growth hormone recipients initiating treatment after 1977. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:E1666–9. 10.1210/jc.2011-135721816775
  5. Wakisaka Y, Santa N, Doh-ura K, Kitamoto T, Ibayashi S, Iida M, et al. Increased asymmetric pulvinar magnetic resonance imaging signals in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease with florid plaques following a cadaveric dura mater graft. Neuropathology. 2006;26:82–8. 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2006.00638.x16521484
  6. Soldevila M, Calafell F, Andrès AM, Yagüe J, Helgason A, Stefánsson K, et al. Prion susceptibility and protective alleles exhibit marked geographic differences. Hum Mutat. 2003;22:104–5. 10.1002/humu.915712815603
  7. Nurmi MH, Bishop M, Strain L, Brett F, McGuigan C, Hutchison M, et al. The normal population distribution of PRNP codon 129 polymorphism. Acta Neurol Scand. 2003;108:374–8. 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00199.x14616310
  8. Mercier G, Diéterlen F, Lucotte G. Population distribution of the methionine allele at the PRNP codon 129 polymorphism in Europe and the Middle East. Hum Biol. 2008;80:181–90. 10.3378/1534-6617(2008)80[181:PDOTMA]2.0.CO;218720902
  9. Doh-ura K, Kitamoto T, Sakaki Y, Taateishi J. CJD discrepancy. Nature. 1991;353:801–2. 10.1038/353801b01682813
  10. Brandel J-P, Preece M, Brown P, Croes E, Laplanche J-L, Agid Y, et al. Distribution of codon 129 genotype in human growth hormone–treated CJD patients in France and the UK. Lancet. 2003;362:128–30. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13867-612867116
  11. Furtner M, Gelpi E, Kiechl S, Knoflach M, Zangerl A, Gotwald T, et al. Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease 22 years after human growth hormone therapy: clinical and radiological features. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79:229–31. 10.1136/jnnp.2007.12226718202218
  12. Noguchi-Shinohara M, Hamaguchi T, Kitamoto T, Sato T, Nakamura Y, Mizusawa H, et al. Clinical features and diagnosis of dura mater graft–associated Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurology. 2007;69:360–7. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000266624.63387.4a17646628
  13. Yamada M, Noguchi-Shinohara M, Hamaguchi T, Nozaki I, Kitamoto T, Sato T, et al. Dura mater graft–associated Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Japan: clinicopathological and molecular characterization of the two distinct subtypes. Neuropathology. 2009;29:609–18. 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2008.00987.x19659940
  14. Nozaki I, Hamaguchi T, Sanjo N, Noguchi-Shinohara M, Sakai K, Nakamura Y, et al. Prospective 10-year surveillance of human prion diseases in Japan. Brain. 2010;133:3043–57. 10.1093/brain/awq21620855418
  15. Ladogana A, Puopolo M, Croes EA, Budka H, Jarius C, Collins S, et al. Mortality from Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and related disorders in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Neurology. 2005;64:1586–91. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000160117.56690.B215883321
  16. Garruto RM, Reiber C, Alfonso MP, Gastrich H, Needham K, Sunderman S, et al. Risk behaviors in a rural community with a known point-source exposure to chronic wasting disease. Environ Health. 2008;7:31. 10.1186/1476-069X-7-3118577220
  17. Diringer H, Braig HR. Infectivity of unconventional viruses in dura mater. Lancet. 1989;1:439–40. 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)90035-42563815
  18. Pocchiari M, Peano S, Conz A, Eshkol A, Maillard F, Brown P, et al. Combination ultrafiltration and 6 M urea treatment of human growth hormone effectively minimizes risk from potential Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease virus contamination. Horm Res. 1991;35:161–6. 10.1159/0001818941806470
  19. Yunoki M, Tanaka H, Urayama T, Hattori S, Ohtani M, Ohkubo Y, et al. Prion removal by nanofiltraion under different experimental conditions. Biologicals. 2008;36:27–36. 10.1016/j.biologicals.2007.04.00517890100
  20. Cardone F, Simoneau S, Arzel A, Puopolo M, Berardi VA, Abdel-Haq H, et al. Comparison of nanofiltration efficacy in reducing infectivity of centrifuged versus ultracentrifuged 263K scrapie-infected brain homogenates in “spiked” albumin solutions. Transfusion. 2011. Epub ahead of print. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03425.x22082124
  21. Gregori L, Gurgel PV, Lathrop JT, Edwardson P, Lambert BC, Carbonell RG, et al. Reduction in infectivity of endogenous transmissible spongiform encephalopathies present in blood by adsorption to selective affinity resins. Lancet. 2006;368:2226–30. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69897-817189034
  22. Heger A, Bailey A, Neisser-Svae A, Ertl M, Römisch J, Svae TE. Removal of prion infectivity by affinity ligand chromatography during OctaplasLG manufacturing—results from animal bioassay studies. Vox Sang. 2011. Epub ahead of print. 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2011.01563.x22070802
  23. Piccardo P, Cervenakova L, Vasilyeva I, Yakovleva O, Bacik I, Cervenak J, et al. Candidate cell substrates, vaccine production, and transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:2262–9. 10.3201/eid1712.11060722172513
  24. Fichet G, Comoy E, Duval C, Antioga K, Dehen C, Charbonnier A, et al. Novel methods for disinfection of prion-contaminated medical devices. Lancet. 2004;364:521–6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16810-415302195
  25. Fichet G, Antioga K, Comoy E, Deslys JP, McDonnell G. Prion inactivation using a new gaseous hydrogen peroxide sterilization process. J Hosp Infect. 2007;67:278–86. 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.08.02017942185
  26. Fichet G, Harrison J, McDonnell G. Reduction of risk of prion transmission on surgical devices with effective cleaning processes. Zentr Steril. 2007;15:418–37.
  27. Orrú CD, Wilham JM, Raymond LD, Kuhn F, Schroeder B, Raeber AJ, et al. Prion disease blood test using immunoprecipitation and improved quaking-induced conversion. MBiol. 2011;3:e00078-11 [cited 2012 Mar 31]. http://mbio.asm.org/content/2/3/e00078-11.full
  28. Orrú CD, Wilham JM, Vascellari S, Hughson AG, Caughey B. New generation QuIC assays for prion seeding activity. Prion. 2012;6. Epub ahead of print.

2012年5月28日 星期一

中華民國總統之合法性



 




中華民國總統應回金馬就職




蔣為文




中華民國即將於五月二十日辦理總統就職典禮。我們在此建議中華民國應盡速遷回金門與馬祖,並在金馬辦理總統就職大典。理由如下:




第一,中華民國固有疆域不包含台灣。中華民國的憲法源自一九三六年五月五日在中國公布的中華民國憲法草案(簡稱五五憲草)。五五憲草第四條述明「中華民國領土為江蘇、浙江、安徽、江西、湖北、湖南、四川、西康、河北、山東、山西、河南、陝西、甘肅、青海、福建、廣東、廣西、雲南、貴州、遼寧、吉林、黑龍江、熱河、察哈爾、綏遠、寧夏、新疆、蒙古、西藏等固有之疆域。」此外,依據現行中華民國憲法(一九四七年一月一日公布)第四條規定,「中華民國領土,依其固有之疆域,非經國民大會之決議,不得變更之。」何謂固有之疆域?依五五憲草規定,台灣並非中華民國的固有領土。




第二,中華民國可以來台,是代表聯軍接受日軍投降。一九四五年日本天皇正式投降後,美國總統簽署同意由聯軍統帥麥克阿瑟發布一般命令第一號(General
Order No. 1)
。該命令其中一項內容為指派蔣介石代表聯軍到台灣及越南北部接受日軍投降。照理講,完成受降任務後蔣介石軍隊就須從當地撤退。譬如,駐越二十萬蔣介石大軍已於一九四六年夏天從越南撤退。可是,蔣介石不僅不從台灣撤軍,甚至還將中華民國流亡政權搬來台北。




第三,依照佔領不得移轉主權的國際原則,中華民國不能在台灣就地合法。承上所述,為何蔣介石不從台灣撤退?因為他在中國「打輸走贏」!一九四九年中國共產黨於中國建立中華人民共和國。那時蔣介石僅擁有中國的金門與馬祖。為增加稅收、兵源及土地,蔣介石的中華民國只好藉「播遷來台」的名義賴在台灣不走。這種「乞食趕廟公」的情形猶如到旅社住宿,住久了卻說自己擁有旅社的所有權。其實,根據國際慣例,佔領不得移轉主權。此外,一九五二年生效的舊金山和約也重申,佔領軍應於完成任務三個月內撤軍。台灣人有權力依據舊金山和約要求中華民國遷回金馬,台灣人沒有義務「認賊作父」。




第四,Chinese Taipei (中華台北)的真實意涵為「Chinese
government in exile in Taipei
(中華民國流亡政府在台北)。國際慣例上經常以Chinese
Taipei
來稱呼中華民國。中華民國故意翻譯成中華台北,其實,其真正意涵為中華民國流亡政府在台北。以歐洲國家「波蘭」為例,二次大戰期間因德國納粹及蘇聯入侵,故波蘭政府於1940年流亡到英國倫敦,並建立Polish
government in exile in London (
波蘭流亡政府在倫敦),簡稱Polish
London
,直至1990年才結束流亡政權。




第五,一中或二中,均屬中國家務事。馬英九擔任中華民國總統期間,不僅親中,且一再表示中國接受「一中各表」。既然中華民國與中華人民共和國已簽定ECFA,形同結束敵對狀態。中華民國及其軍眷全體遷回金馬應該沒有安全的顧慮,不必擔心中華民國被中華人民共和國併吞。台灣人應依戰爭法的國際慣例,譬如琉球民政府模式,自行組織民政府,之後再公民投票決定政治前途。




(作者為成功大學台文系副教授)




原文發表於台灣時報4版專論2012/4/25




http://blog.libertytimes.com.tw/uibun/2012/04/25/115860


 


Taiwan was never a part of China that was established in 1911. Therefore, Taiwan never did "split from China amid a civil war". Taiwan was never involved "in a civil war with Mao's communist army in China" !


This is the brief history of Taiwan:


1. Taiwan had been a colony of Japan since the defeat of Ching Dynasty of China in a Sino-Japanese war, according to the peace Treaty of Shimonoseki 馬關條約 (1895). Prior to this war, Taiwan was loosely administered by Ching Dynasty of China as a province only for 8 years.


2. Following the 1945 Japanese defeat in the WWII, Japan “gave up” Taiwan according to the San Francisco Peace Treaty 舊金山和約 (Sept, 8, 1951).


3. However, after the war, the commander of the US Army Forces of Far East, Douglas MacArthur, ordered Nationalist Party (KMT國民黨) Chiang Kai-Shek蔣介石 to take a foothold in Taiwan in 1947.


4. Chiang brought his ragtag soldiers that was so corrupt and utterly defeated by Mao’s communist army to the island and formed a government-in-exile, Republic of China (ROC) in Taiwan, claiming the island to be a part of China and exercised the martial law for more than 35 years, the longest known in the world’s history.


5. In 1955, U.S. Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, co-author of the Peace Treaty, affirmed that the treaty ceded Taiwan to no one; that Japan "merely renounced sovereignty over Taiwan".


6. Taiwan elected its first Taiwanese president, Lee Teng-hui 李登輝, in 1988, who stated that Taiwan and China is a “special country-to-country relations”.


7. Lee was followed by another Taiwanese, elected president Chen Shui-bian陳水扁 in 2000, who emphasized Taiwanese identity and sovereignty.


8. Current Ma Ing-jeou馬英九, a KMT, whose father was a Chinese, took office in 2008, and then made known his position that "Taiwan is a part of China" after the election, as China demanded, despite 90% of the islanders wishing to be either independent or remain status quo, a de facto independence for fear of Chinese attack.


9. At present, the Taiwan's democracy is protected by the US Congress' Taiwan Relations Act (1979), and Six Assurances (1982).






2012年5月25日 星期五

白癡首長,只能靠無恥部下拍馬屁




 [雖然無法找到尹啟銘的成名作:「無愧風雨,信心未來」拍馬屁全文,而只讀到被人引用的幾句,感覺這個人實在無恥、肉麻到極點!! 這種不要臉的官員只可能是台灣KMT文化的產品,現代化國家很難見到這類可憐蟲。現在的台灣人要講這些話才能求得職位安穩嗎? 好可悲! 就不知道國人被麻死前,能夠忍耐多久]

馬朝兩個寶




詳全文馬英九會不會拚經濟?看他的用人就可以得到答案。而劉憶如與尹啟銘這兩個前後任經建會主委,更是解開馬惠帝無能的關鍵線索。




歐債危機是全球經濟最嚴峻的考驗,今年以來不斷引發強震,但劉憶如表面上坐鎮經建會,卻心繫馬英九的選情,忙著炮製宇昌案打小英,以輔選馬英九為己任,置台灣經濟危機於度外。此人選後果然獲得重賞,坐上財政部長寶座,如今舊疾復發,再度不顧歐債危機重創台股,硬推證所稅,以成就馬惠帝之「歷史定位」為要,不管股民與台灣資本市場的死活。




再說現任經建會主委尹啟銘的天才程度也不遑多讓,在希臘可能退出歐元區的大衝擊,以及台灣各項經濟指標惡化之際,竟然忙著扮演廟公半仙角色,以一張五年前抽到的籤詩,歌詠馬惠帝之英明,捧得馬皇龍心大悅,頻頻稱許為「非常有遠見的開示」,其吹喇叭之肉麻程度,令人嘆為觀止。




馬英九無能之真相,如今連升斗小民皆可一眼看穿,四年來毫無政績可言,路人皆知,尹半仙卻護主心切,一切施政缺失推給阿扁,而吾皇有「不欺暗室、光風霽月」的襟懷、「反躬自省、內疚神明」的修為,英明偉大,乃千古罕見之明君。




讖緯之說流行於東漢,是一種怪力亂神的政治預言,乃亂世的徵兆;如今馬惠帝治國無能,尹半仙卻在廟堂之上散布讖詩,而馬皇亦不避諱公開按讚,君臣不論民間疾苦,卻在符讖之中相互取暖,恐怕是馬政府走到末日的預兆吧。




 




阿銘真是個人才




詳全文 謝志杰




尹啟銘以「無愧風雨 信心未來」為題,撰文讚馬總統有「不欺暗室、光風霽月」的襟懷、有「反躬自省、內疚神明」的修為,只差沒說馬總統小時候在溪邊看到魚群逆流而上的造神故事。在讚馬的同時還不忘批扁,認為平均薪資下滑乃是前朝餘毒,讓在監所裡的陳前總統躺著也中槍。




尹啟銘認為,台灣平均薪資之所以無法大幅增加,主要原因乃是因為扁執政八年,使得「廠商大舉外移、企業關門大幅增加。」接著又說,在公司關門大幅增加、新設大幅減少之下,使得就業機會大減,這就是台灣平均薪資無法增加的主要原因。




造成薪資無法增加有許多原因,廠商外移只能說是其中之一的原因,但不能將所有的問題全部都歸咎於企業外移,還要與政府政策有相關。尹主委怎麼不談當年22K的企業實習生,讓大專文憑直接貶值的愚蠢政策?政府花錢當冤大頭只為了美化數字,企業樂得使用便宜勞力,最大的輸家就是人民,新鮮人找工作有許多人都是從月薪二萬二談起,企業因為有了這些廉價勞力,反而讓中高齡及長期勞工失業,政府間接成了勞工殺手。




薪資無法增加還有國家政策問題,行政官員應按世界局勢、對岸強勢及台灣優勢來進行施政,二○○八年正因為全民對於民進黨的不信任,所以才讓馬政府有機會出線,但在經過四年之後,馬政府並沒有交給人民一張很好的成績單,從大專文憑的貶值、無薪假可得諾貝爾獎、到今日的油電雙漲及國營事業肥貓等問題,不知經建會是否有明確的對應政策?還是一切都是「扁」之過?




(作者從事自由業)




林正法




台灣竟有如此厚臉皮經建會主委,難怪台灣經濟成長率在亞洲四小龍裡吊車尾,只會用嘴巴〈台語〉(講到嘴巴全唾液,要做沒半步)。




尹主委你當然感覺很好,因為馬總統去年替你們加薪三趴,又有十八趴優惠存款利息,如果是我也會非常感激、讚美他。當一位經建會主委,看到台灣經濟成長是亞洲四小龍之末,不知有何感想,是要怪歐債危機,還是怪前朝扁政府留下的爛攤子,只要有不好數據,就推向扁政府,我們聽膩了。




我期待尹主委跟馬總統能面對現實,不要空口說白話,一項六三三政策跟股市兩萬點,麻煩你們先實現,再說黃金十年吧?




尹主委說的沒錯,台灣人真的脫胎換骨了,現在物價上漲率很嚇人,一個饅頭就漲五成,油、電、健保、民生用品那項不漲價,真脫了人民一層皮,若沒有晚上再兼差,真無法生活,所以要有鋼筋水泥骨才能撐下去。




(作者從事電子業)




拍昏君馬屁,奸臣也!













拍馬逢迎是人性醜惡面,社會上司空見慣,官場更是常見,只會令人作嘔、不齒,隨著權力愈大、官位愈高,拍馬逢迎之害也節節高,當掌握國家大權的執政者,喜好拍馬逢迎,形成馬屁文化,誤國害民,莫此為甚!


孟子曾說,長君之惡其罪小,逢君之惡其罪大。意思是指臣子迎合昏君之惡,導致政策走向錯誤方向,危害國家人民更大,這種拍昏君馬屁的奸臣,比助長君王之惡,罪惡大得多。



「逢君之惡」之臣,在中國古代史書都被列為「奸臣」,像宋朝的秦檜,迎合昏君宋高宗趙構寧投降苟安的心理,屈殺忠良以屈膝求和,成了千古奸臣。



像明朝的太監魏忠賢,迎合昏君明熹宗朱由校,得以把持朝政,殘害忠臣,忠志之士一空,明朝滅亡之日也就不遠了;接任的明思宗朱由檢,剛愎自用,一意孤行,自我感覺良好,自認英明又勤政,任用的宰輔周延儒、溫體仁都在迎合他,搞得國政更壞,最後成為亡國之君,死前卻還在推卸亡國之責。



不少人以明思宗喻馬英九,是否恰當,各有見地,不過,國民黨馬英九政府,最近興起一股「馬屁文化」,像尹啟銘之流,並非罕見,馬英九無能,「逢君之惡」的馬屁官、藍軍立委、媒體等,只會迎合他的錯誤政策,把國家「整」得不像國家,人民更被「治」得慘兮兮,看來馬英九愈來愈像明思宗了。



馬英九恐將成亡中華民國之君,台灣人民絕不能為其所誤成亡國之民!


 


拍馬屁 抱馬腿













◎ 陳志卿


阿扁時代的交通部長曾於二○○六年因旱象解除脫口說出「天降甘霖,是陳總統鴻福齊天」的話,被奉為馬屁文化的經典。與多年前台灣省前主席邱創煥所說過「主席關愛的眼神」一樣,都可流傳千古。



可是相較於經建會主委尹啟銘對馬總統的讚揚,郭、邱兩人都瞠乎其後。因為前兩人了不起是對主子的恭維與表達效忠而已。



但尹主委將馬英九形容成具有「外慚清議、內疚神明的修為」以及「不欺暗室、光風霽月的襟懷」,簡直是將馬英九捧為千古難逢的明君聖主了。台灣的經濟發展多年來雖然原地踏步,但官場馬屁文化卻與時俱進推陳出新,直入化境。



但就像國王的新衣一樣,明明是一絲不掛,眾臣子卻睜眼說瞎話盛讚國王的衣服剪裁貼身,質料華美,直有霓裳羽衣之妙。讓國王沾沾自喜,信以為真。所以國王固然愚昧,但臣子們睜眼說瞎話卻罪更大。



所謂「千穿萬穿,馬屁不穿」,尹啟銘的一番恭維讓馬英九陶醉不已,讓馬英九自我感覺良好的病症又加重一級,真不曉得尹啟銘是愛馬還是害馬? (作者從事服務業)




◎ 楊鎮榮



馬英九現在因為油、電雙漲以及美牛案,已經搞得焦頭爛額了。剛好有此佞臣以五年前求的過時籤詩,還可以拿來大做文章而且極盡阿諛之能事,如果只是當做開玩笑也就罷了,但煞有介事的馬隨後神情愉悅回應說解籤詩是「非常有遠見的開示」。兩人如此自得其樂起來,似乎已經忘了現實世界人民痛苦的問題,可憐的是那些天下蒼生,仍然在水深火熱之中。



有句俗諺「自古忠臣都出諍言」,但對照一個主掌國家經濟建設計畫的經建會主委尹啟銘,面對當前國外有歐債危機、國內又因油、電雙漲導致的通貨膨脹,可能引起經濟大衰退的時刻,竟然不思如何因應以面對危機,卻是對馬發表諂媚的歌功頌德文章,說馬是什麼「不欺暗室、光風霽月」、「反躬自省、內疚神明」的修為襟懷,乍聽之下全身都起雞皮疙瘩來了,還以為回到了以前皇恩浩蕩的帝制時代,李前總統批馬是把自己當做皇帝,看起來還是有些道理的。



(作者為中小企業負責人)


 







2012年5月23日 星期三

十大最痛咬傷

十大最痛咬傷 美專家親身體驗 【01:20】

 

1 of Largest Thai Dental Clinics ISO Certified. Get Promo Package!

〔中央社〕大部分的人都知道被蜜蜂螫到是什麼感覺。幸運的是,大多數人都可以避開被食蛛?蜂(tarantula hawk)或火蟻咬到的那種可怕疼痛感。

不過,英國「每日郵報」(Daily Mail)報導,施密特(Justin Schmidt)把終身職涯全心投入在研究昆蟲後,他親身體驗過這3種疼痛感,還有另外147種難受的灼熱感。

在進行許多野外考察時,這名美國亞利桑那大學(University of Arizona)的昆蟲學家都會挖掘生物居住地,不過這些昆蟲都很不高興,因為這名具破壞性的人類會把牠們挖進包包內,因此牠們便把毒牙、刺或螯也往他身上招呼。

不過,沒有親身經歷過,怎麼知道有多痛,施密特把他的經驗變成施密特刺痛指數(Schmidt Sting PainIndex),在排行榜中為78種昆蟲排名,以1到4的等級評估疼痛程度,雖然這個排名很主觀,不過這是由最知道有多痛的人所編列的。

● 10大有刺動物

第10名:汗蜂(Sweat Bee),等級:1.0,施密特說:很輕、很短暫。感覺像是有個小火花把手臂的1根汗毛燒掉。

第9名:火蟻,等級:1.2,施密特說:很強烈、有點讓人害怕。

第8名:牛角相思樹蟻(Bullhorn Acacia Ant),等級:1.8,施密特說:一種罕見、刺痛、令人發麻的刺痛感。像是有人在你臉頰上訂上訂書針。

第7名:大黃蜂(Bald-Faced Hornet),等級2.0,施密特說:深層、強烈。像是你的手被正在轉動的門壓到。

第6名:小黃蜂(Yellow Jacket),等級2.0,施密特說:灼熱,感覺像會冒煙。想像有人將雪茄弄熄在你的舌頭上。

第5名:蜜蜂(Honey Bee),等級2.0,施密特說:感覺就像火柴摩擦你的皮膚並燒起來。

第4名:紅收獲蟻(Red Harvester Ant),等級:3.0,施密特說:魯莽且無情。像是有人用鑽頭挖出向內長的腳指甲。

第3名:長腳蜂(Paper Wasp),等級:3.0,施密特說:被叮完後明顯更痛。像是把一大杯鹽酸灑在傷口上。

第2名:食蛛?蜂,等級:4.0,施密特說:令人暈眩、極其強烈。像是正在使用的吹風機掉進你的泡泡浴內。

刺痛之王:子彈蟻(Bullet Ant),等級:4+,施密特說:像是走過燒得火紅的木炭上,還有3英寸的生鏽鐵釘刺進腳後跟。

● 子彈蟻疼痛感

子彈蟻產生的刺痛感很強烈,可持續24小時。

有些被叮過的人把這種疼痛感比喻為「跟被子彈射中一樣」。幸運的是,對大部分的讀者來說,這種螞蟻的棲息地只能在尼加拉瓜與巴拉圭之間的中美洲雨林內找到

5-20 台灣最羞恥的一日

【李筱峰專欄】知識分子教訓蔡正元!


自由時報


蔡正元不也是知識分子嗎?當然不是,不要以為留美就是知識分子。知識分子絕不會為強勢者立言,而是為弱勢者講話,就像證峰法師林秋梧說的「願同弱少鬥強權」!



土生土長,不曾參加民主運動,從學生時代就參加中國國民黨,效忠蔣家外來政權的蔡正元,本性一直難改。總統大選時,蔡某為配合炒作宇昌案來批鬥小英,口出惡言辱罵何大一、翁啟惠、楊育民、陳良博等生化學者是「三七仔」、「敗類」!這次因中研院法律所黃國昌副研究員批評旺中媒體併購案,他又大放厥詞,在立法院質詢時揚言刪除中研院法律所預算!這次蔡某的言行不只是人身攻擊,更透過立法濫權,凌辱言論與學術自由。終於引起學界與社運團體發動連署抗議!蔡某不僅不知反省,卻進一步辱罵抗議的團體說「這批『族繁不及備載』的綠色團體,根本就是一批跳樑小丑!」還形容這些團體「名不見經傳」,囂張撒野到了極點。



他把包括「中研院自由學社」、「台灣人權促進會」、「台灣守護民主平台」、「台灣高等教育產業工會」等團體說成「綠色」團體,目的是要「政治化」這些團體的動機,意指這些團體是民進黨的外圍組織。然而,了解社運現狀的人當然不認為這些團體是民進黨的團體。不過即便這些團體是站在綠營立場,應該也是極正常的事,我倒想反問,一個土生土長的台灣子弟,為何老是站在那群原本是外來統治集團的「遺形物」的藍營裡面?為何老是站在破壞台灣獨立自主的「中共同路人」的陣營裡面?



可笑的是,被蔡某說成「名不見經傳」的團體中 ,還包括「台灣人權促進會」,這個擁有廿八年歷史、在人權運動上發揮相當成果的社運團體,蔡某竟然認為「名不見經傳」,其孤陋寡聞還不是普通級的!



蔡某的無知還不止此,猶記得二○○四年總統大選時,連宋陣營刊登一則廣告,將扁總統的執政團隊命名為「烏魯木齊共和國團隊」,當時任發言人的蔡正元還特別說明這則廣告是取材自陳水扁二○○○年總統大選前訪問「蒙古烏魯木齊市」的照片(見二○○四年三月六日台灣日報)。天哪,蒙古哪來的烏魯木齊?國中生都知道烏魯木齊(所謂迪化)是在東土耳其斯坦(新疆),而不在蒙古。蒙古共和國的首府是烏蘭巴托。



像這麼無知的人,竟然敢狂妄地辱罵今年迄今已經發表過六篇中英文論文的黃國昌副研究員是「戴著學者面具的假面人」,還敢出來侮辱知識分子、踐踏言論與學術自由!



這種政客當然不知什麼叫言論自由、什麼叫知識分子。我請胡適先生教示他,胡適說:「言論的自由可以鼓勵人人肯說『憂於未形,恐於未熾』的正論危言,來替代小人們天天歌功頌德、鼓吹昇平的濫調。」其中所謂「憂於未形,恐於未熾」(在事態還未形成、還未嚴重之前就憂心戒慎)就是「以天下為己任」的知識分子應有的胸懷與責任。



「以天下為己任」的知識分子們,請站出來反抗這種政客與財團結合的惡勢力!



(作者李筱峰現任國立台北教育大學台灣文化研究所教授http://www.jimlee.org.tw



《星期專論》啟動Me to We的公民運動


◎王美琇


自由時報


今天,是台灣民主史上最羞恥的一天。因為,有一位支持率只剩下十五%的總統要就職第二任。他已經完全喪失統治正當性。可是他依然一意孤行,視民意如糞土。面對這樣的總統,人民該怎麼辦?我們真的拿他一點辦法都沒有嗎?



從個體力量到群體力量



Me to We」(從我到我們)是一種行動哲學。也是全球最大「兒童幫助兒童」公益組織創辦人加拿大籍的基爾博格(Craig Kielburger)所發起的「Free the Children」(解放兒童運動)背後理念基礎。



一九九五年一個清晨,當基爾博格正在吃早餐、讀報紙時,他讀到一則讓他十分震驚的新聞:「一個巴基斯坦的小童工,四歲時被父母賣給工廠,每天工作十二小時,一天所得不到一美元。這名童工工作到十歲。從十歲開始他站出來反抗不公,引起國際矚目,後來被射殺身亡。」這則報導改變了基爾博格的一生。



這位十二歲的小男孩,開始結合一群志同道合的青少年朋友,展開組織與行動。他們組成「解放兒童」志工組織,希望能改善世界童工的悲慘遭遇。他們連絡全世界的人權組織,透過其協助走訪印度、巴基斯坦、泰國等十幾個亞洲城市,探視童工生活與受剝削的情況;也訪問全球企業和政教領袖,希望他們關心弱勢兒童的未來。十幾年下來,基爾博格所領導的組織,改變了全球一百多萬兒童的命運,並三度獲得諾貝爾和平獎的提名。



基爾博格的行動哲學就是「Me to We」。他相信,唯有從我到我們、從個體到群體,結合一群人的決心、智慧、行動和力量,一定可以改變世界。



公民運動正在改變世界



一九八八年和一九九七年,日本政府兩度提高消費稅而引起全民抗議,在東京等大都市興起家家戶戶在窗口「垂掛布簾,表達反消費稅」的公民運動。



今年五月五日,日本最後一座核能反應爐終於停機,創下四十二年來首見的零核電局面。成千上萬的反核民眾湧上東京街頭,慶祝日本正式進入零核電時代。這是去年三月核災之後,在全國風起雲湧的反核運動成果。這個公民運動不但改變日本政府的核能政策,也開啟了公民力量改變政治的可能性。



在世界成熟民主國家,公民意識愈強大,公民運動就愈具能量,運用公民運動來改變惡質政治的可能性就愈大。這種從個體化為群體的公民運動,不僅在世界各國蔚為風潮,成為改變政治的巨大能量;這幾年,也在台灣各個角落悄悄上演,形成在地公民運動,正在改變台灣人的公民意識和政府政策。



士林王家祖厝拆除事件引起全國矚目,抗議人士喊出「今天是王家,明天是你家」的訴求,非常有感染力而引起共鳴。這就是「從我到我們」的行動哲學。讓所有的公民意識到,如果不站出來聲援受害者,明天自己可能就會成為受害者。他們把個人力量化為群體力量,以群體力量來對抗侵害人民權益的公權力大怪獸。



除此之外,澎湖博弈公投、苗栗農地保護運動、反國光石化運動、反中科護水運動、反核運動、反美牛、反水電雙漲等。在在顯示台灣的進步公民團體,正在試圖以「由下而上」的公民運動,來改變長久以來「由上而下」的威權政治決策。



政治已介入我們的生活



然而,長久以來國民黨的威權統治和白色恐怖,讓許多父執輩的人總是教育兒女:「不要過問政治。」結果就是:人民乖乖聽話,政府要你繳稅就繳稅、油電要漲就漲、隨時要拆你的房子就拆。然後,他們將人民的納稅錢亂花,或將錢放進自己口袋,人民完全無可奈何。



他們要我們害怕政治、討厭政治、疏離政治,他們就可以為所欲為。然而,即使我們不介入政治,政治也會介入我們的生活。開放瘦肉精美牛進口、油電雙漲帶動萬物飛漲,有沒有介入生活?是誰決定開放美牛和油電雙漲政策?不就是馬總統嗎?這當然是政治,政治已經介入我們的生活。



所以,一個社會必須有進步的公民和媒體,才能有效監督濫權的政府。有進步的公民,才有進步的社會;有進步的公民,才能形塑進步的文明國家。



值得注意的是,始終有墮落的媒體在袒護一意孤行的總統及其政府。當所有的社會力和政治力即將匯流成河,表達人民集體不滿時,這些媒體就開始操作成「藍綠對抗」的政治戲碼,企圖讓民眾因為對政治反感而退出抗議行列,執政者藉此削弱反對的能量。這就是國民黨和護航媒體的慣用手法。



事實上,世界各國歷史中能夠撼動政權的力量,最初的導火線可能是一個意外事件,最終能將人民力量匯聚成河的,絕大多數還是政黨的組織力和動員力。韓國十萬人走上街頭反美牛,也有政黨力量做有效的組織奧援,最終迫使李明博總統出面道歉、改變政策。



蝴蝶效應和燈塔效應



公民團體和進步媒體所帶動的公民運動會產生「蝴蝶效應」,在全國人民的心中不斷蔓延開來;而有領導力的政黨,最終必須將巨大的公民力量匯集成河,揭竿而起成為「燈塔效應」。反對黨必須做為人民的「燈塔」,帶領社會力,對蠻橫又無能的政府展開最有效的監督。



街頭路線、議會路線和公民運動三頭並進吧!From Me to We,從我到我們,從個體到群體。所有關心台灣前途、關心人民生活的進步公民動起來吧!唯有我們積極動起來,展現集體公民力量,才能對惡質的政治進行最強大的施壓!



我相信,一群人的力量,一定可以改變政治;一群人的意志和決心,一定可以改變台灣!開始啟動Me to We的公民運動吧!(作者王美琇為專欄作家)



去「他,馬的」勢


自由時報


大家都把焦點放在十五萬人上街嗆馬,但是創馬最深、最鉅的,卻是中國國民黨立院黨團修改組織與運作規則之議。示威遊行固然聲勢浩大,直接衝擊馬英九的威信,卻不見得能逼馬回歸正軌,更不必說下台了;遊行的效應,是形式意義大於實質。相反的,國民黨的黨團以落實黨內民主機制為理由,決議修訂內規,黨團不再是橡皮圖章。老實說國民黨立院黨團已形同發動政變,若而成功,實質結果遠大於形式改變。



依媒體報導,國民黨立院黨團修訂內規,要達到至少三個目的:第一,行政院的重大決策,立院黨團要事先參與,並且經過黨團表決才能成案;第二,部會首長若經過黨團大會多數決,認為不適任,行政部門應予尊重;第三,黨團成員依動員令出席表決,若無故持相反意見或不聽勸阻者,應增訂加重罰款、喪失黨團幹部候選資格或下屆立委選舉提名資格。換句話說,立院黨團掌控了政策權、人事任免權以及立委提名權。



這三個權力正是黨中央或說黨主席的權力命脈所繫,也是以黨領政的唯一保證。一旦三權全被掏空,權力勢必從黨中央移到立院黨團,這不是政變是什麼?不是剝奪馬英九的所有權力是什麼?不是架空黨主席是什麼?對照日前國民黨有中常委在常會中公開提議馬英九應免兼黨主席,兩相對照,可見其來有自,不是無跡可循。



國民黨是革命政黨,從政黨員一貫唯唯諾諾才有糖吃,內閣閣員誰敢不聽指令?當年身為黨秘書長的金溥聰,甚至毫不忌諱的抨擊不接旨的閣員「踩到紅線」,且不惜開鍘立威,現在為什麼黨團大造黨中央之反?正因為馬英九執政失靈而禍及立委。與其坐視馬英九大權在握搞得天怒人怨,不如起而自保,取消馬的乾坤獨斷,把權力轉到立院黨團手中。一旦成功,明顯的是,國民黨會從剛性「以黨領政」的政黨,改變為柔性的「立委自主」政黨;對國民黨而言,卻是走向民主的契機。想不到的是,此轉折竟然出自馬的無能而非有為,真是歷史的弔詭。



更弔詭的是,十五萬人上街撼動不了馬分毫,國民黨立院黨團的區區立委,卻幫台灣人民解決了「他馬的」這個亂源,也幫溫吞吞的遊行圓了「去馬」的訴求。有趣罷!(作者金恒煒,政治評論員)



用愛與勇氣釋放阿扁


作者: 楊憲宏



《開飯》雜誌


更新於︰2012-05-05


特赦阿扁情理所在


被關押三年半的阿扁多病纏身,馬政府不予善治不准保外就醫,激發台灣人深切同情。將發動第二波救阿扁救台灣百萬人聯署,要求馬英九五二○就職特赦前總統陳水扁。



陳水扁(左)獲准出監房和太太、兒子陳致中,


今年一月去祭拜岳母之喪。


陳水扁前總統從二○○八年十一月被關押至今已經三年六個月了,到底馬英九總統要凌遲他的前任到甚麼程度?這位「台灣人總統」還要被關在國民黨的黑牢多久?雖然媒體「刻意」不報導、不議論,但在台灣社會卻是一個火熱的話題。台灣有一個「蕃薯電視台」,主持人汪笨湖天天在電視上主持三小時的叩應節目,阿扁支持者大集結,每天的話題都是,「台灣人的總統,台灣人來救」,他們正準備五月下旬,馬英九總統就職日前三日,到台北示威,埋鍋造飯向國民黨要人。



辦案有偏見,掩蓋阿扁病情


特赦陳水扁,讓陳水扁「保外就醫」是今年五二○接頭最具衝突的議題。



馬英九的執政失能,包括美牛議題的爭議及油電漲價所帶來巨大民怨,都是讓「陳水扁事件」成為焦點的導火線,偏偏馬英九老愛拿陳水扁當他的對比,更讓人回想起陳水扁,也因為過去幾年,陳水扁被藍營「妖魔化」太厲害了,而事實上,三年半來的審判過程,並未呈現馬英九所指控的所謂「貪腐事證」。甚至出現「國務機要費」無罪的宣判。特偵組的辦案能力及有無偏見是被高度質疑,加上阿扁三年半以來,多種病症纏身,卻被「有意無意」的忽視,把肺部疾病的咳嗽說成「感冒」,把心臟疾病視為「精神官能症」,動用有爭議的抗焦慮藥,而靠近攝護腺的精囊腫塊的診斷過程也是牛步化。



這種漠視阿扁病情情況,上至法務部下至監獄,似乎有一套說法企圖掩蓋,立法委員被告知「阿扁的病情沒有他們家人說的那麼嚴重。」「阿扁咳嗽都是客人來時才咳得厲害」。說這些話的人,全無醫學背景,卻自認為有診斷能力,隨意評斷阿扁「病情」。



可是阿扁在署立桃園醫院的病歷記載,卻不支持官方獄方這些粉飾太平的說法。這種矛盾更突顯了,有強大的政治力黑手,躲在後面指揮著阿扁在監獄中的待遇。如果依照阿扁目前病歷所記載的病況,早就應保外就醫。但是一個病情的確診可以延宕了三年多,還在不清不楚的狀況繼續打混,現在又衍生出新的病灶,診療一樣「慢慢來」,至少台灣醫界高明的診療水準,在阿扁身上是看不到的。



病歷也一樣寫得不清不楚,該追查都不「及時」追查,好像再等誰下令才敢進行下一步,如果社會不給壓力,就不管阿扁如何氣喘,把阿扁都「白老鼠」,一下要阿扁吃美國仙丹類固醇,一下要阿扁吃抗過敏藥,可是到底目的何在?卻不先搞定阿扁的病因診斷,難怪社會大眾有深深疑慮。



阿扁心肺問題○八年已發現


仔細回顧整個阿扁病史的爭議點,自二○○八年在土城看守所第一次送醫,阿扁的心肺問題已出現症狀,到了二○一○年十二月心臟冠狀動脈有問題也浮出了,因此當時阿扁「走一下就會喘」。可是二○一一年一月三日陳致中探視後,籲請臺北監獄讓阿扁就醫,典獄長方子杰竟稱,「陳水扁不適是吃藥所致,並沒那麼嚴重」。在各方要求下,獄方才在二○一一年一月十九日讓阿扁至署立桃園醫院就醫,早上八點去,下午兩點就送回。 



二○一一年一月十九日的署桃病例上的記載十分耐人尋味,在檢查呼吸困難問題最重要的肺功能測試項目下,竟然寫的是「病人嘗試做了三次測驗失敗」,就沒有下文了。雖然後來今年三月八日,也就是一年多之後,有進行肺部的電腦斷層掃描及進行支氣管內視鏡的檢查,發現除了有肺泡融合及支氣管擴張問題外,也有一處有明顯的病灶(lesions),會隨著呼吸移動,到底是什麼,也說不出所以然來。



署桃在病歷上所記載的用字「病灶」是一個醫學上描述不正常的解剖組織病變的模糊說明。出現這個字的時候,醫師必須采取更加積極探查的態度。也就是醫師應該開出一連串的檢查,有時會要求病患者住院,不然就是在一周之內,進行地毯式檢驗。可是阿扁並沒有被以「平常心」對待。



南方朔批國民黨道德法西斯


從三月八日之後至現在,阿扁的呼吸困難加劇,可是他何時可以得到「一般人在醫院裡應得的照顧」,則還不確定,也是因為官方處理「陳水扁事件」的荒謬引發了著名評論家南方朔的批判,南方朔在民進黨執政時批扁不遺餘力,這次他寫批馬文章《當政府變成茶杯就只剩下茶杯風暴》時措辭尖銳說:



「陳水扁保外就醫及特赦風波為例。打從扁案發生起,它就應是個嚴肅課題。曾擔任過國家領導人的人物,他們的羈押、審判及服刑,應當如何處理?對這種人特別處理不是特權,而是對國家領導人的這種身分的尊敬。但自從扁案發生以來,台灣藍綠對立急遽升高,國民黨的道德法西斯立即抬頭,如果有人敢主張不同處理,一定被罵到臭頭;而且國民黨的統治者也一直把扁案當提款機,它們聯合炒作下,國家元首犯罪如何處理的嚴肅問題已沒有了合理討論的空間。扁案及扁家人完全被道德法西斯的氣氛所籠罩。



扁案正發生時,我曾批扁不遺餘力,但連我都覺得對阿扁的羈押及服刑處理有欠妥當,相信一定有更多人氣憤不平。但這有什麼用?這次阿扁由於身心出狀況,有人主張保外就醫,有人認為應移監和恢復若干禮遇,甚至特赦,但這種可以合理討論的問題立即被道德法西斯冷嘲熱諷或攻擊,很值得合理討論的問題,最後只淪為茶杯風暴一場。」



特赦阿扁是對總統身分的尊敬


南方朔接受蘋果日報專訪時更強調:「很多國家對卸任元首都有特別處理方法,韓國對前總統犯罪僅用軟禁,美國前總統尼克森被特赦也沒道歉,德國《憲法》甚至保障卸任元首犯罪不追究,避免國家陷入政治清算風暴。



  南方朔強調,對卸任國家領導人特別處理不是特權,而是對總統身分的尊敬,「道不道歉不重要」,許多人認為扁沒懺悔,南方朔認為:「這不是討論問題的方法。」像蘋果日報這麼認真討論陳水扁事件的媒體在台灣絕無僅有。蘋果日報的「蘋論」也站出立場表白「馬應特赦扁」,左右開弓下手也十分結棍厚實。在所有陰謀論當中最負面的是台灣社社長吳樹民的說法:扁在獄中已經到了臨界點,心理煎熬非常嚴重,「這是虐待,我覺得我們台灣人的總統被人這樣侮辱,就是對台灣人的侮辱。」把扁的貪污問題轉移成「侮辱台灣人」的族群矛盾,心態十分可議。



  馬英九拒絕考慮特赦阿扁,把原來在自己身上的壓力轉而丟給民進黨。但是,作為總統必須對重大政治事件說清楚自己的想法,不能一句「不會考慮」就打發了事。馬必須說明為什麼不會考慮?利弊分析如何?



  如果我們是二十一世紀的人類,就要遠離叢林法則並棄之如敝屣;也要排除所有陰謀論的惡性政治思維,就心理與精神面尋求普遍正義和提升境界做出努力。至少,馬及其幕僚應該要分析福特總統特赦尼克森和南韓兩位前總統也被特赦的原因及效果,做出能夠服眾的說法。例如美國政治史家就認為福特的特赦尼克森在歷史上是正確的,是選擇自我承擔,終結相關法律與政治紛擾,讓法律免於處理超越法律所能解決的政治對抗,使國家恢復正常。



第二波特赦阿扁將聯署一百萬人


從高層面看,若特赦扁可以終結藍綠對抗與弭平社會裂痕,特赦就能達到對國家更有利的效應。何況特赦是總統特權,更是寬容的美德顯現。 



現在本土社團聲援前總統陳水扁的第二波連署行動已經展開,這一波的行動是以五二○特赦阿扁為訴求,將串聯國內外的人權呼籲。上一波連署是以保外就醫為主題。目前連署人數已破了二十萬人,主事者正開始動員,目標是一百萬人。



特赦也好,移監也好,保外就醫也好,不論是那一種處置,都代表著一件事,台灣還要把一名前任總統關到什麼時候?這個問題是需要被討論的話題,這不是藍綠問題,而是一個文明的民主國家,對於前任國家元首的罪與罰的慎重,也是出於族群感受的敏感考量。就連一些藍營的青壯派重量級人物,在私下也都主張,特赦是一個必須考量的議題,甚至暗示著「馬英九任內關的人,馬英九應在任內放人。」今年五二○是一個時機。為什麼大家都不約而同的表達這樣相同的想法呢?



主要原因之一是,當年雷聲碩大的將陳前總統收押,接二連三的庭訊,反而有些案件判了陳前總統無罪,目前所剩未完成審決的案子,是否可能判罪也很有爭議。依目前既有的判決衡諸世界各民主文明國家,很少因而繼續羈押前任元首。



氣憤馬將阿扁當作政治提款機


另一個重要考量是,特別是南部地區,全台灣有愈來愈多人,感覺「關押陳水扁,就是關押台灣人」,一種族群感受的壓力正在漸漸加大。這是一種「相對被剝奪感」的情緒升溫。這樣的思維不見得是來自理性層次,但是卻非常的真實。畢竟陳水扁總統曾經得到超過五成選民支持而當選,他的被關押,曾經熱情支持他的選民,心情會產生什麼樣的變化,都是文明國家的社會領袖不能不思考的議題。



在案件剛發生時,或被強力揭弊媒體第一擊所重創時,支持者可能會對阿扁感到憤怒、失望,甚至因而變得消極。但是經過法律程序上的再揭露或澄清,許多支持者開始覺得媒體有過度操縱之嫌,而當馬英九總統在今年大選辯論時,仍然用阿扁議題在譏諷民進黨的對手蔡英文,甚至有媒體謔稱馬英九將陳水扁當做他的「政治提款機」時,有相當多的選民開始覺得馬英九是「得了便宜還賣乖」的政客。



關押阿扁激起身為台灣人的悲哀


他們看見民進黨人為了勝選而對陳水扁及其家族切割,落入藍營所操作的「離間分化」時,許多人開始同情陳水扁,而其監獄只有一點三坪同住兩人,更讓許多人昔日支持者感到深深悲痛。而陳前總統為岳母奔喪時,電視全程轉播他跪拜的形影,加上扁媽與他相遇,阿珍與阿扁相擁的鏡頭,都讓許多人感到震撼。這一系列有著強烈的族群情感的轉移,也就是「身為台灣人的悲哀」。而最深沉的投射是「關押陳水扁,就是關押台灣人」,就是象徵著外來統治者的幽靈在恐嚇台灣人,「你沒有資格執政,陳水扁的下場就是警告!」



當國民黨在二○○○年敗選之後馬上逼走台灣人總統李登輝,而帶領了政黨輪替的陳水扁,在剛做滿八年任期就被以貪污罪名起訴而關進監獄,繼而中國或是「外來政權」的影響力日增的台灣政局,終於讓本土的認同者感覺到,似乎有一股暗黑的惡勢力在阻止「台灣人出頭天」,這樣的恐懼夾雜著悲情就全部爆發了。不論是用特赦或是移監、保外就醫,當局不能錯失這個處理時機,陳水扁與他的支持者有權提出這些訴求,不論他們的動機是什麼,都有一定的正當性。最長於看政治力分析的前反扁紅衫軍許信良,甚至去監獄探望陳水扁表達支持特赦的心意。



支持阿扁的一邊一國連線,正在進行新一波的社會運動武裝,打出「政治和解,終止對抗」與「用愛與勇氣釋放阿扁」,五二○要就職的馬英九,要面對「焦土」還是「樂土」,就在一念之間了。



看馬記者會滅火/只說空話 問題解決方案在哪?


記者鄒景雯/特稿


自由時報


連任就職前夕,馬總統召開記者會,針對過去四年提出了四個不滿意,以為這樣,就可以清理戰場,第二天開始又是嶄新的一天。但是真的很悲哀,不只馬本人,包括陳?與江宜樺共三人,根本文不對題,這種記者會不開還好,開了,政府威信又被踹在地上多了好幾個鞋印。



政府施政,很重要的一個任務,也是唯一的目標,就是為人民解決問題,除此之外,一切高論都不是核心議題,民調都已經慘跌到這種節骨眼了,居然還有人天真地述說「改革的道路永遠是上坡路」,「改革不能等」的空話,這等自以為是,豈不是把大家的哀號直指為反改革?



馬英九通篇的邏輯很簡單,他在從事改革,所以他沒有錯,只是做的不夠滿意,但方向是正確的,今後仍將在既定的政策上持續前進;這也是他「不安」、「虧欠」、「過意不去」,各種形容詞用盡,就是絕不採取行動、鄭重道歉的原因所在。



民主國家選出國家領導人,不是用來聽取為政者百般辯解的,而是不管黑貓白貓,要能抓老鼠的才是好貓,過去四年,這隻貓搔不到癢處、抓不到老鼠、沒能力解決民眾的問題,反而製造人民更大的痛苦。



如果四年終了、在即將再度就職之際,還沒有辦法好好地告訴大家:我知道問題出在哪裡,我的解決方案是什麼,那麼對於全國人民來說,這隻笨貓還是不知道如何抓老鼠,則馬英九五二○宣誓就職的意義在哪裡?



馬英九是總統,沒有人想看笑話,更不願意見到未來四年養這個政府只是在浪費糧食、虛耗時間、扼殺機會而已,因此必須奉勸:總統的「民間友人」說馬「調勻呼吸,就健步如飛」,這種偏離事實、便佞諂媚的假話,千萬不能當做馬蹄雜沓、盲目治國的安慰劑,否則誤己、誤民、更誤國,屆時後果將不堪設想。



辣蘋果:塔裡的馬英九(余艾苔)


2012