2012年3月31日 星期六

How does former ambassador to Taiwan criticize "one China, two districts" move?

A big step in the wrong direction



By Nat Bellocchi 白樂崎  / 


Sun, Apr 01, 2012 - Page 8




At the annual Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) forum held in Beijing on March 24, former KMT chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) put forward the concept of “one country, two areas” as the basis for future cross-strait talks. This proposal appeared to come out of the clear blue sky, and has raised eyebrows in Taiwan and overseas.


The move caused commotion in Taiwan, with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and Taiwan Solidarity Union criticizing it and promising to mobilize protests. What is different about it? Or is it in line with existing policy, as the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has claimed?


Let us examine the idea and its context, and see if it helps or hurts Taiwan’s international position.


First, we must note that the proposal was launched at the CCP-KMT forum, which has become an annual ritual between the two parties. This is not a good development for Taiwan, because the topic was raised in party-to-party discussions. Experience shows that the CCP-KMT forum is not the proper place for the development of cross-strait policy, because it does not involve legislative oversight, accountability or transparency, which are essential elements in a democracy.


Second, it looks suspiciously like the “one country, two systems” formula proposed by China, first for Hong Kong, and later also as a “model” for Taiwan. The new term is therefore a further step on the slippery slope toward the “one country, two systems” formulation. In view of the reluctance of Beijing to give the people of Hong Kong the freedom to choose their own leader and move toward full suffrage, one wonders if this is a wise move.


Third, defenders of the new terminology have argued that it moves the discussion between the two sides of the Strait forward, and that it adheres to the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution. The problem with this argument is that it strengthens Beijing’s hand and weakens Taiwan’s sovereignty by putting Taiwan on the same footing as Hong Kong and Macao, as an “area” that is part of the country called China.


To just about everyone around the world, China is synonymous with the People’s Republic of China. Few outside a small circle of diehard ROC supporters in Taipei still adhere to the argument that “one China” equals the ROC. This is simply not the present-day reality, and the sooner everyone says farewell to that anachronism, the better.


One must also wonder what implications “one country, two areas” would have for foreign policy and defense. An “area” generally does not have a foreign ministry to conduct foreign relations, or a military to defend its territory. Does Wu propose merging the foreign and defense ministries of Taiwan and China?


Wu’s ideas must thus be seen as a turn in the wrong direction, which could lead to instability and a downgrading of Taiwan’s international status.


If Taiwanese and their government want to strengthen Taiwan’s relations with the international community, they need to emphasize — not de-emphasize — Taiwan’s freedom, democracy and sovereignty. Making a complicated situation even more confusing by -inventing yet another fuzzy term does not help.


As I have argued before, moves such as this one and the so-called “1992 consensus” may bring the temporary false perception of a relaxation of tensions across the Strait, but in the longer term, they reduce Taiwan’s room for maneuver on the international stage, leading to increased tension down the road.


Most of all, what does this move actually gain for Taiwan?


If Taiwan really wants to move toward long-term stability, it needs to work on an internal consensus, a “Taiwan consensus,” on how Taiwanese, through a democratic mechanism, perceive their future. For long-term stability, Taiwan needs to strengthen its position as a key member of the regional economic framework among East Asian nations, and for long-term stability it is also essential to develop closer political ties with democratic neighbors such as Japan and the Philippines, as well as faraway friends such as the EU and the US.


Nat Bellocchi is a former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan. The views expressed in this article are his own.






2012年3月29日 星期四

台灣政府對陳水扁的處理受各方嚴厲指責








US lawmaker questions Chen treatment

By William Lowther / Staff Reporter in Washington

Fri, Apr 27, 2012 - Page 3

There is growing concern and anger in the US over the way that former Taiwanese president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) is reportedly being treated in prison.
Representative Edward Royce, a California Republican, has written to President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) appealing for Chen to be granted medical parole.
Earlier this week, Human Rights Action Center founder Jack Healy published an opinion piece in the Huffington Post, saying the Taiwanese government was “engaging in willful medical neglect” of Chen.
Shortly before that, -California Representative Dan Lungren asked the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission to intervene on Chen’s behalf.
In his letter to Ma dated yesterday, Royce — a member of the US House of Representatives’ Foreign Affairs Committee and the Congressional Human Rights Caucus — cited “disturbing reports regarding the deterioration in the health and physical condition” of Chen.
He said that Chen is suffering from prostate cancer, acute coronary syndrome and significantly reduced blood flow to the heart.
Royce said that Chen is confined to a damp, undersized cell for nearly 24 hours a day under conditions that violate rules set for the treatment of prisoners by the UN.
“I therefore respectfully request that you grant former president Chen medical parole in order to receive adequate medical treatment and to ensure the protection of human rights and civil liberties for all,” he added.
Coen Blaauw, an official with the Washington-based Formosa Association for Public Affairs (FAPA), said: “There is a mounting chorus of indignation and anger in [US] Congress about the inhumane treatment of Chen. It is just terrible.”

 


〈金恒煒專欄〉救扁成為團結運動

為什麼洪英花法官堅持並強調「扁案自始無效」?為什麼黃瑞華法官也撰文質疑司法沒有用平常心處理扁案?兩位法官都是從司法的程序正義以及罪刑法定主義出發,都是以法論法。要問的是,為什麼司法要用違法、違憲的手段處理扁案?只證成一件事:扁案是政治案件。扁案中政治介入的斧鑿痕跡斑斑,幾乎無案無之,令人髮指。


為了凸顯扁案是政治誅殺事件,只舉兩例來彰顯。


第一個例證。陳前總統被貼上貪腐的標籤,起於「國務機要費」;當年(○六年)藍調統媒日日揭弊、時時揭弊,遂而有紅衫軍之亂。然而,國務機要費已無罪定讞,那麼從媒體公審,到特偵組公然宣佈「辦不出來就走人」的追殺,到法務部長王清峰在司法節搬演陳前總統「貪腐」的短劇,製造「令人不安的如同馬戲的氣氛」(孔傑榮語),在在呈現司法政治化的事實。


第二個例證。特偵組聲押陳前總統是一回事,但是把陳前總統用手銬銬住送到聲押庭,絕對是政治操作。只要與陳前總統從北監到台南來奔喪相比,就看到特偵組的手銬是政治而非司法。從特偵組到台北地院,不過咫尺,要用手銬?從北監到台南,車程數小時之久,卻不用手銬!為什麼?更且,特偵組起訴陳前總統,在無罪推論原則之下,陳前總統最多、最多是待罪之身,為什麼要用手銬?陳前總統到台南悼祭時,龍潭案已判刑確定,正在服刑,反而不必手銬?為什麼?


扁案就是馬英九為首的外省集團用司法迫害台灣人選出來的總統,事實就是這麼簡單。馬英九炮製貪腐冤獄,把陳總統押入大牢,對外向中國邀功,表示敵慨同仇。對內則妙用無窮:把扁貼上貪腐就轉移了中國國民黨貪腐的視聽;同時取消了陳八年的政績;更且製造綠營內部反扁與挺扁的矛盾。尤其把挺扁的打上挺貪腐,完全是活學活用中共的鬥爭手法與統戰伎倆。就這一點說,民進黨的應對扁案不只是可憐也可悲。


經過四年,陳水扁案的本質愈來愈清楚。不僅民進黨或綠營內反扁人士驚醒,即使藍營內也有人仗義執言;「搶救陳水扁」頓然成為重要的主流民意,尤其民進黨/綠營內部更是有志一同。


綠營中為什麼有特赦陳水扁的訴求?有人不認同特赦,認為是向馬英九求饒。然而,從另一角度來看,未嘗不是給馬英九一個「化解」的機會?扁案既是政治事件,特赦就是用政治解決政治,正當性十足。當然,特赦很難,不是馬英九說了算,還有站在馬後面的中國老大哥;務實來看,民進黨提出保外就醫,當然是比較可行而且容易成功的方式。


重要是,陳水扁是本土政黨唯一成功拿下八年執政的領袖,民進黨切割陳水扁不啻是自我閹割,同時也切割了整體戰力。從六年前開始,藍營統派藉抹黑扁貪腐而成功的攫取政治利益,拿到政權;民進黨沒有反擊、沒有維護正義,結果自食惡果,難道還要繼續錯下去?民進黨終於回應綠營特赦的呼聲,不僅天王們一一到北監探扁,也打出分進合擊救扁的策略。由「切割陳水扁」到「搶救陳水扁」,正見出民進黨的覺醒與轉折;陳水扁再度成為民進黨凝聚力量的核心。在救扁旗幟之下,才有團結可言,也才是回復創黨精神的落實。


(作者金恒煒為政治評論者)



Chen’s treatment ‘a tragedy’: US lawmaker

POLITICAL CRIMINALIZATION::Steve Chabot’s remarks came after FAPA wrote to US President Barack Obama asking for his help in getting Chen Shui-bian paroled

By William Lowther / Staff reporter in Washington

Fri, Mar 30, 2012 - Page 3

A member of the US Congress said on Wednesday that he considered the plight of former Taiwanese president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to be a tragedy.
Addressing the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Representative Steve Chabot soundly condemned Chen’s treatment.
During a committee hearing into the threat of military and economic aggression from China, Chabot said: “I think the fact that the Taiwanese government has decided to move itself into the direction of the criminalization of politics is unfortunate.”
He added: “The previous president — president Chen Shui-bian — is still behind bars.”
“I think for an administration to come in and essentially jail the previous administration is a tragedy,” he said.
Chabot ended his statement — made during the question-and-answer period of the hearing — by saying that he thought the Ma administration should deal with Chen’s imprisonment “sooner rather than later.”
A Congressional staff member, who asked not to be quoted by name because he was not authorized to speak on this issue, said that he expected other members of the House to raise the Chen case.
He said sympathy for Chen was growing, following reports that he was in failing health and being held in a cell without a proper bed and without a table or chair.
The Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) appealed directly to US President Barack Obama last week to help Chen get medical parole so that he could receive hospital treatment.
So far, the White House has not responded.
Chen is currently serving a 17-and-a-half year term on two concurrent sentences related to corruption charges.
The former president was recently diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome, significantly reduced blood flow and a prostate tumor.
He is only allowed 30 minutes of outdoor exercise each day.
FAPA official Coen Blaauw characterized Chabot’s remarks during the Congressional hearing as “dramatic.”
“Chabot has been a very strong supporter of Taiwan. He has met Chen several times,” Blaauw said.
“There is growing awareness and growing concern among members of the US Congress about Chen’s imprisonment,” he said.

 







譚慎格:馬執行討好中國政策

〔駐美特派員曹郁芬/華府二十八日報導〕美國眾議院外委會今天就中國的軍事與經濟威脅舉行聽證會,國際評估和戰略中心資深研究員譚慎格指出,台灣總統馬英九正在執行一個討好中國的政策,基本上馬政府同意台灣是中國的一部分,讓台灣正逐步進入中國的安全框架下,脫離亞洲的民主行列,未來台灣與中國可能會聯手對抗美日,因為台灣有很好的潛艦基地可以被中國用來對付日本,他認為馬政府目前只有中國政策,沒有美國政策。


台灣逐步進入中國框架


夏波議員詢問這個現象是否能逆轉,譚慎格說不是不能逆轉,但從布希到歐巴馬政府,讓台灣人認為走向獨立的政策得不到美國支持,以致台灣沒有選擇,民眾不願選出一個會挑戰中國的政府。


美中經濟及安全審查委員會委員伍爾澤說,他同意譚慎格的分析,但認為馬政府的政策不是沒有民意的支持。傳統基金會研究員成斌則表示,兩岸關係的未來應由台灣人民決定,但美國對台政策需要更有一致性並堅持到底。


今天應邀作證的包括伍爾澤、譚慎格及成斌、麻省理工學院政治系副教授傅泰林。


針對台灣空防,伍爾澤表示,美國同意台灣F-16A/B型戰機升級固然有幫助,但不足以應付台灣防禦所需。他並批評美國的軍事協助只有零星的項目,而不願幫助台灣進行主要的防禦建構調整。


回答議員提問時,研究中國軍事的成斌說,F-16A/B型戰機升級案,無法替代未來廿年台灣將老化的空防戰力,升級後的戰機未來能升空執行任務的時間會減少,即使中國沒有任何動作,台灣空防能力仍將逐年下降。


成斌並指出,北京在太空和網路兩個重要科技領域展示足以挑戰美國的能力,讓美國明白介入要付出代價,同時對東京、首爾和台灣的壓力加大,讓這些國家懷疑美國介入的有效性,質疑的時間愈長,將來在危機時要求美軍前來救援就更為遲疑。他也批評歐巴馬政府要重返亞洲的說法並沒有足夠的資源跟進。




2012年3月26日 星期一

中共腐敗不是新聞;民主絕不只是多數決

溫家寶:中共最大危險是腐敗 【2012/3/26 20:35】

[KMT要率領台灣人投降,受治於腐敗的政權才是驚人新聞! 有人說台灣綠營的人要在520遊行抗議。

 


有幾位在咖啡廳座談,其中有一位KMT,平靜地說: "沒關係,撐幾天,他們就沒聲音了,也不會有人繼續關心。 你不看DPP越來越像KMT了嗎? 中國團來幾次,收入好一點,那些人管他自由不自由、民主不民主?! 為了面子,遊行一次、生一次氣,就夠了。 反正立法院是KMT控制的,硬要合併、投降,DPP又能怎樣? 哼! 遊行?  你們能遊五天嗎?  兩天都有問題!  要更強硬的衝突、表態嗎? 台灣人哪有人有這麼大的膽子,哈哈哈!!  勇氣? 哈哈哈! 笑死人了。 就算反對聲音大,繼續靜靜地進行一國兩區就是了啦,有誰會知道?! 議會的質詢有多大力量嘛。最終的決定權不是在於多數決嗎? 有689萬票,你怎麼否定她們是多數? 立法委員中KMT不是佔絕對多數嗎?  我們不是民主、少數服從多數嗎? 反正馬區長亡父的遺志有誰敢反對?! 一定會達成的啦!  我們不是炎黃子孫嗎? 和中國合併有甚麼不對?  經濟靠中國,你還能有其他路線可走?"

 

一位親綠營台灣人不甘受此侮辱,忿忿地反駁說: "你以為台灣沒有有骨氣的、有自尊心的人 嗎? 你以為那些六百萬投選蔡英文的人會讓台灣成為中國一區嗎? 現在已經是二十一世紀,還用 "炎黃子孫" 推銷民族主義,這還不是那些高官權貴用來鞏固政權、繼續貪汙自肥的手段?  KMT也是需要這種制度才能繼續貪汙嘛! 看她們的貪汙都是以億元算的? 你看美國如此強盛,就是因為自由、民主、和公平法治使他們肯努力發揮各個人的能力,和血統DNA有何關係?  你這種人寧願受中國統治,做他們奴才,真是無恥之極!  經濟靠中國,是因為完全沒有試圖向外擴展過嗎。這還不是馬桶刻意設計的路線。 真是王八蛋!"。 他越講越氣。

 

這位KMT,其實是代代土長的台灣人,有親戚在中國工作。看了他動怒,只好笑笑,心想,你就看嘛。DPP新潮流派的已經要接受九二共識了,你這個不識時勢的頑固份子。等著看看,民性能改嗎?  哼! 

 

這時第三位加入: "別生氣。好好討論。這種影響以後台灣子孫命運的事,能夠由我們這一代的人,只為了錢,替年輕人決定嗎? 這次如果決定台灣要成為中國一區,以後是絕對不可能退出的哦。 現在的年輕人是不願意失去自由、民主的吧?!  你不是為希望在台灣打拼的年輕人製造奴才命嗎? 我們能這麼自私、不為子孫設想嗎? 馬先生是為了實現亡父遺志,我們是為了甚麼?  世界潮流不都是自由民主化了嗎? 連阿拉伯國家都發生革命了"。

 

又有一人插嘴: "不過台灣人缺乏勇氣、不知恥的比例很高也是事實吧(他這麼講,向KMT眼睛很快瞄了一下)。不要說韓國,和泰國都比不上。頂多遊行一次,還可能有甚麼後續動作呢?"]

 
〔中央社〕中國大陸國務院總理溫家寶今天在國務院第5次廉政工作會議上強調,執政黨(中國共產黨)最大的危險就是腐敗,所以今年要大力推進預算決算公開,且嚴格控制「三公經費」。

根據中國政府網和中國新聞網、香港中通社等大陸官方媒體報導,溫家寶指出,當前反腐倡廉建設與人民群眾的期待仍有較大差距,腐敗現象在行政權力集中的部門和資金資源管理權集中的領域易發多發,社會事業、國有企業等領域腐敗案件逐漸增多,發生在領導幹部中的腐敗問題依然突出。

溫家寶強調,執政黨最大的危險就是腐敗。這個問題解決不好,政權的性質就可能改變,就會「人亡政息」,「這是我們面臨的一個極為嚴峻的重大考驗」。

他說,今年要重點抓好6方面的工作:一、深入推進行政審批制度改革;二、推進公共資源配置市場化改革;三、深化財政管理體制改革;四、推進行政經費使用管理改革;五、加強行政機關和國有企業事業單位財務管理;六、紮實抓好反腐倡廉長期性、基礎性工作。

此外,溫家寶表示,要大力推進預算決算公開。報送全國人民代表大會審查部門預算的國務院部門和單位,要公開全部預算決算表格,並細化到款級科目(預算會計科目中的2級科目);教育、醫療衛生、社會保障和就業、「三農」(農業、農村、農民)、保障型住房(大陸官方為中低收入戶提供較低廉租金或價格的住房)等支出要細化到項級科目(預算會計科目中的3級科目)。

他還指出,今年要嚴格控制「三公經費」,且繼續實施零成長,並禁止用公款買香煙、高檔酒和禮品。

大陸所謂的「三公經費」,就是因公出國(境)經費、公務車購置及運行費、公務招待費產生的消費。

溫家寶說,今年還要嚴格控制行政機關、國有企業事業單位修建、裝修辦公大樓等樓堂館所;禁止超標準使用和豪華裝修辦公室;禁止使用公款和利用機關影響購置、蒐羅奇花異石和高檔藝術品裝飾辦公區域。




學生談郝市府強拆民房事件
(
之一)民主絕不只是多數決




郝為之




三月二十八日凌晨,發生撼動社會的公權力強拆民房事件。然而政府的回應卻是冰冷一句話「民主社會照顧多數權益」,換言之,戰場定調在以民主為由的少數與多數權益間戰爭。




市政府與部分媒體或許認為,民主社會僅是少數服從多數的機制,公權力因此有必要為了多數利益而犧牲少數,然而以上論述誤解了民主的本質。學界常以不同面向評斷民主是否良善,將其分為程序、內容與結果,其中民主內容品質便是以各項自由權為首的基本公民權,尊重與維護個人的基本權利,是為民主的核心價值;此外,在某些討論強調少數人權益的少數權,也是民主常被檢驗的概念,因此民主絕非如政府與媒體所言粗淺的依法行政與多數決。




政府是為商與民之間的協調角色,兩相權衡一為個體住戶的基本生存權,另一為都市更新與建商荷包的所謂公利,此間衝突該如何論斷,絕非政府透過現行都更法規多數與少數的簡單切割便可做成。市民與政府建商存在資訊與資源不對等的權力結構,加上都更法有限的救濟方式,更是政府在行政裁量或未來修法上必須衡量之處。民主社會從來不只有程序上的「依法行政」或多數決,民主更大的價值在於保護少數與個人基本權利的體現,因此政府或許更該深思各方權益的折衷方式。




(作者為台灣大學政治研究所碩士生)





(之二)令人心冷的《冷眼集》




方瑋晨




三月二十八日為臺灣人權及都市更新史上的新頁,公權力與建商完全戰勝了人民,全台北市的警力讓人們束手就擒,這一頁黑歷史,將會永遠被記憶。聯合晚報《冷眼集》卻在此人民權利殞落,行政權力張狂之際,選擇了冷眼旁觀,甚至落井下石。姑且不論該文中對士林王家的敘述是否允當,就所謂「法律保障多數利益」之論理部分,文中反覆地提及,民主社會要以多數決為依歸,少數必須服從多數,少數人必須為了多數人的權利做出犧牲,並呼籲公權力必須展現魄力,依法執法盡速執行。




這樣的論理至少忽略了以下幾個重點:首先,該文奉為圭臬的民主程序多數決是否適用於社會上所有的事項?尤其是關於私法自治事項,是否皆可毫無疑問的是用多數決原則,即非無疑。環觀我國法制,公司法上股東會的多數決基於股份得自由移轉,成員得依自由意志選擇加入與否,故同時亦應承擔多數決之結果,因此而具正當性;就土地法三十四條之一而言,是基於共有土地的法律擬制本質之內部關係而證立多數決之正當性;而就公寓大廈管理條例,也是基於公寓建物本身難以切割形成的內部關係而得建立起多數決的正當性。然而都市更新不如上述諸法,權利人被拉入多數決團體中多半是因為「我的房子剛好在你的附近」,對權利人來說,只單純因相鄰關係,即必須讓團體內之群眾來決定他們的命運。這樣一個幾乎是「懷璧其罪」的規定,對人民的財產權具備相當程度之侵害,此規定於憲法保護人民財產權的意旨下是否站的住腳,實非無疑。




再者,要進行多數決,必須要先確定哪些人是多數決團體的成員,哪些人必須被投票結果所拘束,如果可以決定投票的成員,幾乎等於可以掌控投票的結果。於都市更新條例中,多數決團體之建立在於都更單元劃定,都更實施者(常為建商)於劃定更新單元時僅須符合市政府所訂定的若干指標,即可自行劃定都更單元,進而在該單元中開展一連串的作為及多數決。無庸置疑的,誰來主導、誰來劃定,當然就對誰有利,實施者必定會為了得到多數同意的結果,而恣意的劃定區域。這樣一來,不同意都更的無辜人民遭到建商強迫劃入團體中,如同待宰羔羊般地被以多數決方式剝奪其財產權,這樣的多數決正當性何在?




理論依據不足的社會評論,只會引導讀者前往錯誤的無知。整個社會中,所謂多數人的利益並不在於多幾棟百坪新建案,而是在於每個人能夠在自己的家安居樂業,在於不會成為王家,在於不會亡家。(作者為台灣大學法律研究所公法組碩士生)






那天,如果深藍朋友在故宮…



◎ 張世賢


上週末清華大學師生前往故宮展場進行參觀教學時,遭遇為中國遊客帶隊的本地導遊大聲喝令讓開的事件,凸顯了台灣人面對財大氣粗的中國人時,習於自我矮化的深沉悲哀,也再度警示台灣經濟密切依賴中國的不良後果。身為自故宮退休的清華畢業生,筆者有話要說。


慘烈破壞三十年才讓經濟成長三十年的中國,造就不少暴發戶,在長期的自卑壓抑後,衍生了尖酸刻薄的自大心理,到歐美日本都趾高氣揚,到了台灣更把自己當成「上國之人」光臨屬地那樣傲慢,也難怪帶隊謀生的台灣導遊會出現一如民初上海租界那種洋人買辦的行為。


台灣人淪落至此,問題出在馬政府實在太糟,不規劃發展可以立足世界的本土經貿產業,而只會全面倒向中國搖尾乞憐,變成必須依賴中國胰島素的糖尿病患。目前台灣已建立太多專門迎合中國觀光客需求的產業鏈,一旦中國變臉切斷客源,鐵定問題叢生,何止導遊當不成買辦而已!


台灣如何才能免於淪為次等國民的惡運,尤其是還有良知的偏藍選民應該深刻省思的課題。(作者為前故宮科技室主任,清華大學畢業生)


(之四)這和共產黨有何區別?

◎吳毓珊



近來鬧得沸沸揚揚的台北市士林區文林苑都更案,讓我想起了年前爆紅的中國重慶「最牛釘子戶」,屋主僵持三年不肯搬遷,工地中央矗立著一棟樓房,成為當地獨特地標。當時網路傳出屋主與建商索求高價,但經記者採訪後,當事人表示,網上所傳向開發商索求高價一事,純屬子虛烏有,她並沒有拿到任何與開發商的協議;當年看到此新聞,尚感觸這世界上怎有如此蠻橫霸道之國家?怎料,比對近日文林苑事件,台北市政府無視抗議及聲援王家民眾,以優勢警力強制拆除,建商甚至連續在各大報登了數次新聞廣告,指出王家索取高價,讓王家背上「貪婪釘子戶」的名號;整起事件簡直是重慶「釘子戶」的翻版!



台灣政府放任意圖謀取開發利益之建商進行都更坐視不管,甚至淪為幫兇,這與中國共產黨蠻橫無視人權的做法有何分別?無疑是對台灣民主一個重擊、大開民主倒車之舉。(作者為屏東科技大學機械系學生)


 


馬英九想當李宗仁第二?

馬英九總統滿嘴巴「愛台灣」卻滿腦子「為中國」,明顯是自我認同混亂的人格分裂,乃至以「捍衛中華民國」之名,行「終結中華民國」之實。上樑不正下樑歪,目前已有不少台商在中國擔任黨政軍職務,真不知道馬英九對此是否「樂觀其成」?根據國安局的初步統計,目前台灣人民在中國擔任全國政協委員、地方政協或特邀委員、地方人大特邀代表等職務者,合計一六九人!從時間來看,絕大多數發生在馬英九執政期間。



諷刺的是,整天高喊「門打開,阮顧厝」的陸委會主委賴幸媛,想必忙於執行馬英九的傾中政策,完全沒有掌握實際的情況,更不要說依法處罰了。國安局能掌握的情資,賴幸媛有什麼理由不能掌握?難道她是躺著幹的嗎?而國安局既然已經掌握情資,為什麼不立即知會陸委會依法處罰以儆效尤?難道是怕觸犯馬英九、得罪中國嗎?如果陸委會、馬政府繼續置之不理,台商「投誠」中國者一定爭先恐後。


除此之外,馬政府刻正「專案研究」林毅夫案,似乎有意為他「返台祭祖」鋪路。假使馬政府真的讓「敵前叛逃」的林毅夫來台而不予法辦,即使國防部長辭職也沒啥用,因為該舉必然導致軍心士氣蕩然無存,台灣的心理國防防線徹底崩潰。正沉迷於台海和平假象的馬英九,甚至應警惕中國以政治撒手鐧,護航林毅夫大搖大擺來台、風風光光祭祖。例如,中國硬要橫柴入灶,大可指派林毅夫當海協會會長,充當中國代表來台談判順帶祭祖。請問,屆時馬英九招架得住嗎?



馬英九常說,他會以生命來捍衛中華民國主權;他且自我感覺,捍衛中華民國勝於以往歷任總統。如果馬英九的所作所為,能夠稱之為捍衛中華民國,那麼蔣介石的漢賊不兩立、蔣經國的不接觸、不談判、不妥協,算老幾?說難聽一點,中華民國的歷任總統,馬英九最像的應屬李宗仁。一九四九年,李宗仁主張與毛澤東「和平談判」,幻想一個中華民國、一個中華人民共和國和平共存,結果不但和談代表投降毛澤東,中華民國且被消滅,而李宗仁則「棄國」飛往美國,最後「回歸祖國」。



大家且看,馬英九執政之下,執政黨的榮譽主席們,海基會的會長副會長們,哪一個不是「媚共」有加?哪一個不是講「北京話」比講「台灣話」大聲?那些人的言行有「以台灣為主,對人民有利」嗎?那些人是否經常爭取「促統」的立功表現?馬英九實在應該仔細讀讀「中國現代史」,比較一下那些人與李宗仁的和談代表有什麼差別?除非,這一切都是馬英九所「樂觀其成」的,大不了到時候效法李宗仁飛往美國,反正綠卡隨時可用,家人也有美國籍!



日前,香港行政長官的小圈子選舉(並非人民普選,而是幾乎由北京操控的一二○○名選舉委員投票),北京屬意的梁振英獲得六八九票當選。無巧不成書,馬英九這次大選也獲得六八九萬票。同樣的六八九,應該是會讓中國領導人會心一笑的「一國兩英」吧。第二任尚未就職,馬英九從上次大選前的「台灣的前途必須由二三○○萬台灣人民來決定,不容中共的干預」,倒退到中國從未承認的「一中各表」,再倒退到連「各表」也消失的「一國兩區」,意圖讓台灣「香港化」,他的「統一藍圖」越來越清晰了。



國家元首、三軍統帥如此,試問:未來四年,退役將領到中國高呼「國軍共軍都是中國軍」者,會增加還是減少?現役將校淪為中國間諜者,會增加還是減少?台商擔任中國黨政軍職務者,會增加還是減少?更不要說,選後萬物齊漲,薪資所得卻倒退到十四年前的水準,貧富差距飆至九十三倍的歷史新高,四年後大家的生活會更好還是更差?一句話,不想當「台奴」的人,五二○鬥陣上街討伐,讓馬英九明白台灣人民對他的倒行逆施絕對不會逆來順受!









民進黨民調 近八成民眾認為兩岸不同國

〔記者李欣芳/台北報導〕國民黨榮譽主席吳伯雄在中國提出「一國兩區」,民進黨昨發布最新民調指出,針對「台灣與大陸是不是屬於同一個國家?」七十七.九%的民眾回答「不是」,僅十七.五%的民眾回答「是」。此外,五十九.七%的受訪民眾表明無法接受兩岸關係就是一國兩區的說法,有廿八.一%的民眾可以接受;六十一.六%的民眾認為一國兩區的主張會矮化國家主權,廿九.五%的民眾則持相反看法。


六成不接受一國兩區


民進黨發言人羅致政、林俊憲昨召開記者會,公布最新民調。對於中共總書記胡錦濤表示,「兩岸雖然還沒有統一,但中國領土和主權沒有分裂,大陸和台灣同屬一個中國的事實沒有改變」,六十七.三%的民眾不同意胡錦濤的這項說法,二十三.七%的民眾表示同意。


要求馬撤回一國兩區主張


民調並顯示,八十一.二%的民眾同意民進黨的台灣前途決議文「台灣是一主權獨立國家,任何有關獨立現狀的更動,必須經由台灣全體住民以公民投票的方式決定」;十二.六%的民眾不同意這項主張。


羅致政重申民進黨中常會的主張表示,民進黨要求馬政府公開道歉,並撤回一國兩區的主張。林俊憲則質疑,為何馬英九總統聽不到人民聲音,與人民站在對立面?


對於國民黨指民進黨惡意指稱馬總統「對大陸讓步」,羅致政說,馬政府黨政高層可以不回應民進黨,但必須回應民意。


本土社團諷「馬區長」


此外,台灣國辦公室創辦人王獻極等獨派人士,昨也在凱道演出行動劇,以反諷方式抗議吳伯雄畢恭畢敬將胡錦濤「加持」過的「台灣區政府馬區長辦公室」匾額,面交馬區長,馬區長欣然接受,要在五二○就職時掛牌運作。




 



2012年3月24日 星期六

人到六十 須自知



[就算活到百歲,沒有做些對人有助益的事、畏首畏尾不敢說出心中的感受或付諸行動,是白活了!]


1.『山中雖有千年樹,世上難逢百歲人。』最大限度,你也就活到百多歲(十萬人中才有一個)




2. 能活到九十歲,只有三十年;能活到八十歲,只有二十年。




3. 因為剩下的日子隨時可能病倒,你應留夠醫藥費保姆費;因為剩下的日子不多,你臨走時什麼都帶不走,你不必太節省。




4. 該花的錢要花,該享受的要享受,該捐助的要捐助;惟獨不能留這筆錢給兒孫,把他()慣成“寄生蟲”。




5. 不必對死後的事考慮太多,因為變成灰的你,對表揚與批評已無感覺。




6. 不必對兒女的事考慮太多,“兒孫自有兒孫福,休為兒孫做馬牛”。




7. ()養了孩子,讓他()自己照顧或用他()自己的錢雇保姆照顧,不要讓他()再剝奪父母(剩下不多)的健康、休息、娛樂、旅遊權。




8. 不要對兒女幻想太多,孝順的兒女有孝心,但工作太忙,幫不了你!




9. 不孝的兒女也許(在你活著時就搶奪)盼著你早死,好早日繼承你的財產。




10. 你的錢財,兒女認為給他們是天經地義;兒女的錢,卻不是你的錢,你想要卻十分困難。




11. 六十歲的你,再也不要用健康去換取身外之物,因為此時,你用金錢已未必能買到健康。




12. 錢掙到何時、何數(十萬,百萬,千萬……)才算夠?『良田萬頃,日食三升;大廈千間,夜眠八尺』,夠吃夠用就行了。




13. 我們要愉快地活著,雖然家家都有一本難唸的經,我們不需要和別人比名利地位、兒孫如何有出息…等等,而要比誰活得更愉快、健康、長壽!




14. 我們無力改變的事,就不必太操心,因為操心也無用,反而影響了自己的健康。




15. 幸福靠自己努力創造,快樂要千方百計去尋找,只要心境好,每天想愉快的事,做愉快的事,自己找樂趣,就能天天都過得高興。過一天,少一天;過一天,樂一天;樂一天,賺一天。




16. 精神好,病不倒;精神好,病能好;精神好,病早好。




17. 心情愉快,適當運動,常見陽光,食物多樣化,保證多種維生素和微量元素的合理(適度而不超量)吸收,盼能健康地再活二、三十年。




18. 能解決的事就不需要擔心,不能解決的事擔心也沒用;不要同傻瓜爭辯、否則別人會搞不清到底誰是傻瓜。




 19. 聖經說:死亡是眾人的結局,無人可以逃避。死後往何處去?乘今日還有時間,值得花點時間探索一番,不虧來世界這一趟!




 20. 最簡單的長壽秘訣.........…就是保持呼吸。千萬記得,不要斷氣!





2012年3月23日 星期五

一群無恥之徒














[因為日治時,日本總督府內政部長後藤新平的評語,台灣人以"貪財、怕死、要面子" 留名於世。可是這麼無恥的台奸還是首聞!!! 


看了以下這些消息,腦筋清醒的人,不會感到毛骨悚然? 還是要默然接受? 目前看來,台灣已經走上民主自由的最後一里路,以後,不僅這一代,子子孫孫,都要受貪腐專制政權管治、做奴才,永無翻身之日。(這些台奸的命運當然是要好多了!)


改變這條可怕惡運的路線,只有不怕死,每一位還有自尊心的台灣人,挺身出來抗議,大喊: 不自由,毋寧死;沒有主權、沒有公平法治,毋寧死!]


("Give me liberty, or give me death--不自由,毋寧死" 這句名言是Patrick Henry 於 1775-3-23 在 Virginia Convention喊出來的。當時在場者,聽到這一句,群起大喊 "give me liberty or give me death",決議派軍隊加入獨立戰爭。)












貨真價實的區長

中國香港今天將選出新任特首,有投票權的選民並非是全體香港公民,而是由一個一千兩百人組成的「特區行政長官選舉委員會」票選產生;候選人不管有幾位,必定是北京的口袋人選當選。這種具有中國社會主義特色,揉雜香港資本主義的「非民主方式」選出的特首,叫做「區長」。


幾天前,說他化成灰都是台灣人的馬英九派遣特使吳伯雄「進京」,透過「晉見」胡錦濤的難得機會,大談「一國兩區」。可能是太過心虛,晉見匪酋前,吳伯雄還先去祭拜國民黨總理孫文的衣冠塚。


馬英九的「一國兩區」是什麼碗糕?他的特使在不放棄武力犯台的敵人面前,自我矮化說「我是一個地區」,希望敵人能尊重我不是國家的「區格」;換言之,剛連任台灣總統的馬英九,想要獲得北京當局的首肯,證實他是一個貨真價實的「區長」。


不曉得是台灣人瞎了眼睛,還是馬英九喪盡天良?這位剛騙取台灣人民選票的政治工作者,竟然以追求「中國區長」為己任,置「台灣總統」尊嚴於度外。雖然事後馬英九的幕僚舉出半部中華民國憲法強說嘴,卻是一點也不能消弭他欺瞞全體台灣公民的罪孽!


中國香港今天選特首,就要產生下屆「區長」,若是香港出生的馬英九心嚮往之,請他放棄台灣總統的身分,自動解職;假如馬英九珍惜他是台灣總統,請他即日起莫再自我矮化,台灣人不接受中國傀儡當總統!







這不是真的!?

一夜醒來,台灣人從窗外看出去,看得見的黨國旗子都變了。從凱達格蘭大道的「反貪腐民主廣場」,不,已改為「人民廣場」,許多晨起的人注視舊總統府改名的「台灣行政長官公署」。這棟前日本殖民時期的總督府,曾升起太陽旗;後來是青天白日旗;現在呢?紅旗上的黃星星恣意地飄搖著。仔細一看,旗幅還有台灣島圖。


馬的,怎麼了?電視、電台晨間新聞報導:林毅夫出任台灣特別行政區長官─一位改了名字的宜蘭人,在蔣經國時代服預官役時志願留營;升任連長時駐防金門,偷渡中華人民共和國;成為投共的先驅者;成為重點栽培對象;一路深造,在美國芝加哥大學攻讀經濟學博士學位時,台灣同學劉憶如後來還當了台灣的財政部長。林毅夫從世界銀行副總裁位置退下了,將在台灣為拚經濟出力。


這下子,林毅夫的妻子不必再氣呼呼為她丈夫回台灣探親的事請命了。比起二○○○年以後,中國國民黨達官顯貴奔赴中國之途,林毅夫的新半山身分讓許多中國國民黨黨棍、黨鞭自嘆不如;遑論入黨只因為當兵省麻煩又多一些假,當公務員多一些升遷機會的卒子們。


馬,哪裡去了?天不知地不知,但據說美國人知道。反正,一干據台統治的中國國民黨要員,在新發佈的行政長官公署官員名單中,大多不見了。新的以台治台政策,拔擢了許多非中國國民黨籍人士及浮上檯面的共產黨人。消息指稱,在野黨將收編成執政體系的一環,台灣將沒有政權異議份子,一體同心拚經濟。


當局宣佈,將在龜山島、蘭嶼、綠島、澎湖無人島甚至中央山脈分別設置專區,收留解職返鄉的舊統治高層,並灌輸具有中國特色的社會主義,進行思想改造。配合是項新國策,電視台、廣播電台、報社、新聞雜誌重新整編,以新中央社統轄;有線電視網全面廢除;蔣銅像將全部拆除,押送煉鋼廠,翻製專區的銅牆鐵壁。


阿扁被特赦了,但限制居住在一個秘密的特定專區。他與家人都受到特別保護。據稱,他已不記得怎樣受到凌遲了,只會揮揮手勢,佝僂的右手手指看得出退化性關節炎的老樣子。


一身冷汗。醒來原來不是醒來;醒來原來只是夢。打開窗,行道樹綠葉飄動,隱約傳來樟木香味。猛敲頭,這才真正醒來!(作者李敏勇,詩人)






真戲與假戲:一國兩區的深層詮釋

中國國民黨榮譽主席吳伯雄「晉見」胡錦濤時,以所謂的「一國兩區」向中國輸誠。但是,中國媒體對此未見報導,似乎仍遲疑於吳伯雄「褲子還沒脫到底」。反倒是,總統府馬上跳出來呼應「一國兩區」,其間所傳達的政治訊息顯然是:吳伯雄所謂的「一國兩區」,便是馬英九本尊的主張,請胡錦濤不要懷疑「傳言有誤」。這是不是馬英九報答胡錦濤助選之舉,且由大家自己判斷;幾乎可以確定的是,馬英九繼續如此自失立場,最後一定會「輸到脫褲子」!


日前,馬英九總統透過總統府發言人稱:兩岸關係就是中華民國台灣地區與中華民國大陸地區之間的關係,台灣地區指台灣、澎湖、金門、馬祖及政府統治權所及之其他地區,而大陸地區意指台灣地區以外的中華民國領土,均屬中華民國;所謂的「一個中國」指的就是中華民國。這些混亂的自言自語,到底是說給誰聽的?這些夢囈,不論是中國、美國還是聯合國,聽到不是都要笑掉大牙嗎?這些話,馬英九要拿來「自欺」便罷,如果想要拿來「欺人」可是騙不了人。


馬英九的思想狀態,彷彿一直停留在「中華民國在南京」年代,所以認為「一個中國」就是「中華民國」,包括台灣地區、大陸地區,甚至還包括蒙古國。問題是,當今的世界上,哪有這麼一個「中華民國」?難道馬英九自以為是康熙大帝嗎?馬英九敢向胡錦濤當面說:大陸地區屬於中華民國領土嗎?馬英九敢跑到烏蘭巴托高喊:蒙古屬於中華民國的領土嗎?在台灣搞這種「政治自慰」,還自我感覺超級良好,跟中國古代那個「夜郎自大」的土皇帝,有什麼兩樣?


可以想像,吳伯雄向胡錦濤提到「一國兩區」時,絕對不敢像總統府發言人那樣,當場進一步解釋「大陸地區屬於中華民國」。我們有理由懷疑,馬英九是否擁有基本的國際法常識。中華人民共和國、蒙古國都是聯合國的會員國,而「中華民國」只能以「中華台北」名義「觀察」聯合國專門機構的會議。請問馬英九,在這種人盡皆知的現實下,您要如何向胡錦濤與國際社會宣達:中華人民共和國、蒙古國屬於「中華台北觀察員」這個偉大的國際法創見?


聯合國所承認的「一個中國」,其唯一合法政府乃是中華人民共和國,並未牽涉到台灣主權。可是,馬英九別有用心,要把台灣連結到「一個中國」,而他所使用的詭計,就是以毫無基礎的「一個中國就是中華民國」,來夾帶「台灣是一個中國下的地區」的謬論。於是乎,馬英九創造了「一中各表」、「一國兩區」的魔術方巾,誘惑台灣人民在「各表」、「兩區」的幻想下,傻乎乎接受他真正想要推銷的「一中」、「一國」。中國方面,真正想玩的也是「一中」、「一國」,但「各表」、「兩區」的戲碼就留給馬英九去麻醉台灣人民罷!


有道是,真的假不了,假的真不了。事實只有一個,所謂的「一中各表」,只有一中,沒有各表;同樣的,所謂的「一國兩區」,只有一國,沒有兩區。或者說,按照國際公認的「一個中國」,只可能有所謂的「中華人民共和國台灣地區」,絕無所謂的「中華民國大陸地區」,胡錦濤也只能跟馬英九說抱歉。關鍵在於,馬英九跟胡錦濤一起演的戲,有「真戲」(一中、一國)與「假戲」(各表、兩區)兩齣,他們想用「假戲」來誘騙台灣人民陷入「真戲」。許多人說,馬英九「攏係假」,誰相信他誰倒楣,真是一點也沒錯!



乞降特使

◎ 蕭貫譽


中國推銷「一國兩制」,就是要對台灣進行統戰及招安,把台灣變成第二個香港,納入中國的版圖、成為她的一部分,接受共產黨的獨裁統治,讓台灣永遠不得翻身。


馬英九與吳伯雄的「一國兩區」,等同於接受了中國的「一國兩制」,正式向中華人民共和國投降,出賣台灣的國家主權與人民權利,換取國民黨的巨大利益,這是非常嚴重的「叛國行為」,高檢署應該主動積極偵辦。


國民黨已派人與共產黨進行磋商、會談「受降條件」,吳伯雄就是身負重任的「馬前卒」,肆無忌憚地進行賣國交易,這種膽大包天的行為,已經無視台灣人民的存在。


向共產黨投降的國民黨,台灣人民還能相信它嗎?「終極統一」的馬英九,還配當台灣的總統嗎?虛擬的「中華民國」還要再騙多久?


國民兩黨都承認虛擬的「中華民國」,在一國兩區的制度下,中華民國會自然消失,起而代之的是,中華人民共和國體制之下的大陸地區與台灣地區,國民黨將是消滅中華民國的劊子手,也是出賣台灣的賣國賊。


(作者為台聯組織部主任)




中華民國區公所

◎ 黃培維


吳伯雄在與胡錦濤會面時提出「一國兩區」的想法,這個想法我想中共當局和台灣人民都覺得相當不以為然。


首先是中共當局,從一中沒有各表,只有一個中華人民共和國的角度來看,一國當然也是只有中華人民共和國,並不是中華民國,中華人民共和國下的一國兩區就是台灣被併吞,沒有其他選擇空間。


再來是台灣人民的看法,大多數台灣人民都認為,台灣是一個主權獨立的國家,只是不被中共所認可而遭受打壓。既然已經是一個主權獨立的國家,為什麼我們還要跟另外一個國家來搞個「一國兩區」?台灣和中國大陸的關係,應該要朝著兩個國家對等平等的方向努力邁進,而不是一直往「一個中國」的統一思考方式前進。


國民黨還在做著大中華的統一大夢,而忽略用心經營自己身處的台灣,當台灣人民正深陷物價高漲和雞豬牛的毒害風暴之中,這時候國民黨榮譽主席還前往中國高談「一國兩區」,正在痛苦當中的台灣人民只能說:「誰理你!」 (作者為政治大學政治研究所碩士生)


◎ 鄭凱文


中華人民共和國在國際間是一個強大國家,而中華民國在國際間是一個天大的笑柄。國際比賽例如奧運,中華人民共和國的選手向著「五星旗」敬禮「唱國歌」,台灣選手向著「中國台北(Chinese Taipei)」旗唱「升旗歌」,顯然我們是不同的國家,而代表國家的兩樣東西,我們表現出來的,似乎沒有國家的象徵。國際組織例如WTO,各國派出的官員,皆是代表自己國家,台灣派的是「台澎金馬個別關稅領域常任代表團」,代表的不知道是哪裡?顯而易見的是,絕對不是中華民國。


就算中華民國是國家好了,就算國際也認知我們是中華民國好了,請問中華人民共和國會使用中華民國的憲法嗎?請問中華人民共和國承認自己是 「大陸地區」 、台灣是 「中華民國自由地區」 嗎?以上我想全部是否定的。但如果我們是「中國合眾國」,可能兩邊的憲法就變成了「州憲法」,又要另外去制定一本「聯邦憲法」,請問讀者們在大笑嗎?沒錯!這就是唯一一個比較合理解釋「一國兩區」的笑話。


(作者為大學生)


◎ 吳庭和


吳伯雄提出自我矮化的「一國兩區」主張,又表明國民黨堅持反對台灣獨立、更提出「兩岸關係不是國與國關係」的喪權辱國言論。


吳伯雄特別強調,他所說的,都有馬主席授權,他只是「受人之託,忠人之事。」顯然這些主張是馬英九「終極統一」陰謀的一部分,故總統府迅速加以追認。


姑且不論馬政權這些言論主張是為掩護其執政無能,或是為其「終極統一」陰謀鋪路。在此,台灣獨立建國聯盟鄭重提醒馬英九先生,台灣主權乃台灣兩千三百萬人民所擁有,絕不容國共兩黨私相授受。台灣現狀的改變,必須經由台灣兩千三百萬人民公投首肯決定。出賣主權是叛國行為,終究要接受人民的審判。


(作者為台灣獨立建國聯盟代行主席)


◎ 楊鎮榮


做為一個台灣人民而言如果未經任何民主程序,想以政黨或個人來改變現狀,那等同於叛國的言論或主張,檢調都應該以危害國家來起訴,否則任何一個阿貓阿狗為了圖謀個人或團體在中國的商業或政治利益,每次都要發表一些媚中害台言論,長此下去,台灣自己內部就會分崩離析了,不用等中國伸手來要就免費奉送了。


民主的真諦是人民為主,關乎國家未來發展的,都應該透過民主程序為之。吳伯雄的思想方式,可能是受到長期戒嚴影響的結果,但奇怪的是,美國哈佛畢業的馬英九帶領國民黨一路走來,對於民主是何物,依然懵懂無知,這就令人百思不得其解了。


(作者為中小企業負責人)









民進黨去死罷!?

看到「新潮流」系的頭頭洪奇昌與「他,馬的」蘇起共同組成「台北論壇基金會」,看到「新潮流」的不分區立委段宜康與前立委郭正亮等參加《中國時報》的座談會,不覺心中一驚的問道:民進黨還存在嗎?


蘇起是「九二共識」的捏造者,民進黨一向不齒其言行,那麼為什麼洪奇昌可以大剌剌與蘇同步同台?選舉期間,民進黨下令不得替非黨員的前主席之子陳致中站台,甚至祭出黨紀,那麼為什麼坐視洪奇昌與敵手攜手?尤其像蘇起這樣的貨色!


無獨有偶的是,段宜康與郭正亮等堂而皇之的成為《中時》座上客,侃侃而談的附和統派立場與策略,壓迫民進黨向兩個中國黨看齊。這還不說,段宜康與郭正亮等竟敢冒大不韙的大唱「澄社」的反調;打了「澄社」耳光的同時,也放棄了「民主」、「進步」的招牌。


「澄社」發動「拒絕中時運動」——「當中時不再忠實,我們選擇拒絕」,因為「《中國時報》…『積極排除不利中國言論』之『自我審查』…」,不僅為中國之打壓民主、踐踏人權擦脂抹粉,同時透過所掌控的媒體,操縱台灣公共輿論與市民認知,故而「澄社」向《中時》說「不」!民進黨沒有積極站出來支援「澄社」揚櫫的正義原則也就罷了,卻反其道而行,接受《中時》之邀,為《中時》塗脂抹粉,向「澄社」說「不」!


民進黨從黨外開始,一向與民間的進步力量之團體並行;現在的民進黨怎麼啦?為了人民幣要出賣台灣主權與公平、正義、民主與人權的價值?這樣的民進黨還算民進黨!?


段宜康舉出「一位」深綠朋友為例,說他沒有票投蔡英文,因為「大家生意都做成這樣,民進黨還在講台灣共和國!」郭正亮也說「有位」深綠朋友,因為他「老婆每月都要去上海教兩次插花,他怕民進黨當選她就不能去了!」首先,這兩位是「深綠」嗎?沒有綠色價值觀而稱深綠,是踐踏綠色!此外,用兩個「孤例」的不投票可以推倒投票的六百零九萬支持者,民進黨要用兩票揚棄六百零九萬票?


民進黨上下若默許洪奇昌、段宜康等人橫行,民進黨去死罷!


(作者金恒煒,當代雜誌總編輯)





Obama asked to help get medical parole for Chen

 


Obama asked to help get medical parole for Chen

‘DEMEANING’:The Formosan Association for Public Affairs called Chen’s treatment an attempt by the Ma administration to humiliate the former president

By William Lowther / Staff Reporter in Washington

Sat, Mar 24, 2012 - Page 1

The Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) has appealed to the White House to help ensure former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) receives the medical care he needs.


In a letter to US President Barack Obama, FAPA president Mark Kao (高龍榮) said that Chen desperately needed medical parole to receive hospital treatment.


Chen is currently serving 17-and-a-half years in prison on two concurrent sentences related to corruption charges.


The letter is FAPA’s latest move as it steps up a campaign to draw attention to what it called Chen’s deteriorating health and “demeaning” living conditions.


Earlier this week, FAPA began organizing US lawmakers to aid Chen.


In his letter to Obama, Kao said: “On behalf of our community we respectfully request that you strongly urge the government of Taiwan to grant former president Chen medical parole in order to receive adequate medical treatment in a timely manner.”


Kao said in a later interview: “We decided to appeal to Obama since we believe that he highly values human rights.”


“Such demeaning conditions as currently being endured by Chen are unprecedented in the treatment of a former head of state of a democratic country,” he said.


“The fact that Chen is held in a damp, undersized cell which he has to share with a cellmate is an obvious attempt by the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to humiliate him,” Kao said, adding that Chen was not allowed a bed, a chair or a desk and had to sit and write on the floor.


“It is not only demeaning to him as a person, but also undermines the quality of the democracy in our homeland. It is reminiscent of the ways the old Chinese emperors dealt with their predecessors,” he said.


“There is no place for this kind of treatment in our modern day and age,” he added.


Chen was recently hospitalized and diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome, significantly reduced blood flow and a prostate tumor.


It was also discovered that he had been receiving anti-anxiety medication for the past 14 months, allegedly without his knowledge or consent.


Chen’s doctors attribute his “degraded physical condition” to an inactive life style and long-term deprivation of sunlight.


The former president is only allowed 30 minutes of outdoor exercise a day.


Published on Taipei Times :

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2012/03/24/2003528563


美國醫師生活狀況調查









Medscape's
Infectious Disease Physician Lifestyle Report 2012

Survey fielded to 292,251 US physicians


• Total respondents: 29,025 US physicians across 25 specialty areas




• Fieldwork conducted by Medscape from 1/12/2012-1/27/2012




• Data collected via third-party online survey collection site






** Respondents were entered into a sweepstakes to win an Apple iPad 2 16GB
Wi-Fi Enabled Device awarded to 5 physicians.




How Happy Are Infectious Disease Specialists With Their Lives
Outside of Work?




According to a 2006 report from the Pew Research Center, 34% of Americans
say that they are "very happy," 50% "pretty happy," and 15%
"not too happy."
[1] Medscape asked US physicians how happy
they were with their lives outside of medicine and to rate their level of
happiness on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the least happy and 5 being the
happiest. The average happiness score for all physicians who responded was
3.96
, which is on the cheerful side. Infectious disease scored 3.97 -- just
about the same as the physician average.




What Are Infectious Disease Specialists' Favorite Pastimes?




Infectious disease specialists rated their top 5 pastimes as reading, exercise/physical
activity, travel, cultural events, and food and wine. Surfing the Web came in a
distant sixth
; it was a favorite pastime of almost 23% of infectious
disease physicians
. A handful wrote in to say that they enjoyed playing
with their children. Some of the more interesting pastimes enjoyed by
infectious disease specialists were target shooting, interior design, and
amateur radio.




Where Do Infectious Disease Specialists Volunteer?




In the overall response to the Medscape survey, the
unhappiest physicians, according to self-rating, were those who didn't
volunteer, followed by those who tutored or did counseling
. Doing any
type of volunteer work was associated with a self-rated happiness score higher
than the overall average score of 3.96
. Of note, in a 2000 survey published
in Archives of Family Medicine, physicians who viewed benevolence as a guiding principle in their lives reported
greater professional satisfaction
.[2] In the Medscape
survey, almost three quarters of infectious disease specialists reported
participating in some form of volunteerism, whereas 27% rarely, if ever,
volunteered
. In the write-in responses, a few infectious disease
specialists noted that they saw patients at the local free clinic or
participated in other pro bono medical work. Others were active in their
children's schools.




Where Do Most Infectious Disease Specialists Lean on the
Political Spectrum?




A May 2011 poll by Rasmussen Reports found that 29% of US
voters characterize themselves as both fiscal and social conservatives, and
only 10% said that they are liberal in both areas.[3] In the
Medscape poll, when asked about their political leanings, about 39% of
infectious disease specialists defined themselves as being both socially and
fiscally liberal -- a percentage almost double that of their peers and 4 times
higher than in the general US population. About 42% of infectious disease
specialists described themselves as fiscally conservative and socially liberal.
Moreover, about 56% reported that they were fiscal conservatives and 82% were
social liberals, making infectious disease specialists one of the most
left-leaning groups among their peers.




Where Do Infectious Disease Specialists Vacation?




With an average of 13 paid vacation days per year, Americans
do far worse than those in other developed countries (eg, Italy, 42; France,
37; Germany, 35; United Kingdom, 28; Canada, 26; Japan, 25).When they go on
vacation, according to a 2009 survey from the U.S. Travel Association, Americans
like to visit friends and relatives, go sightseeing or to beaches, visit
museums, and go to national or state parks.
[4] Infectious
disease specialists do better than most Americans in amount of vacation time,
but not as well as most physicians. Over 30% take 2 weeks of vacation or less,
and only 10% took more than 4 weeks, which was the lowest of all specialties. When

they do take vacations, favorite destinations by far involve foreign travel
(63%), followed by beaches (41%).
Then, 20% prefer road trips, cultural
trips, and staying at vacation homes, followed closely by camping and hiking. In
the write-in responses, some infectious disease specialists said that they
visit family. One commenter enjoys sailing trips, and another likes bicycling
through Europe.




What Percentage of Infectious Disease Specialists Are
Married? Single?




Among infectious disease specialists who responded to the
Medscape survey, around 80% were currently married, a rate slightly less than
that reported by all physicians. Infectious disease specialists reported an
average divorce and separation rate (5.6%) that was similar to all physicians
who responded (5.7%). The percentage of married infectious disease specialists
in this survey is far higher than the marriage rate in the general US
population. In fact, the current US
Census found a decrease in the percentage of married Americans over the past 40
years, from 72% in 1970 to just 48% in 2011.[5] This parallels a
recent Pew Research Center finding that only 51% of US adults are currently
married.
[6] The report also found that the current
marriage rate for people younger than 30 years was only 20%. Of interest, in
the general Medscape survey, nearly one half of all physicians in that same
young age group reported being married.




Does an Infectious Disease Specialist's Marital Status
Affect Level of Happiness?




According to a Pew Research Center report, 43% of married
people reported that they were "very happy," compared with only 24%
of those who were unmarried
.[1] A study (albeit an older one) of
a large sample of medical and dental professionals and their spouses reported
that 85% were satisfied with their marriages and that high levels of marital
satisfaction were associated with high levels of work satisfaction, low levels
of work stress, and fewer psychiatric symptoms
.[7] When
happiness was examined according to marital status, the highest happiness
score (out of 5) was reported by infectious disease specialists who were living
with a partner, with highest scores among those who were remarried (4.53), then
those who were single but living with a domestic partner (4.38)
. In third
place were those in a first marriage (3.98). Infectious disease specialists who
were separated or single and living alone reported being less happy (3.50),
whereas those who were divorced rounded out the bottom (3.12).




How Do Infectious Disease Specialists Rate Their Own
Physical Health?




In our survey, physicians were asked to rate their physical
health on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being very healthy and 1 being in poor
health. The healthiest specialists by this self-rating were dermatologists,
plastic surgeons, endocrinologists, orthopaedists, and cardiologists. The 5
least healthy were general surgeons, psychiatrists, ob/gyns, pediatricians, and
critical care physicians.
Infectious disease specialists who responded to
the Medscape survey were fairly close to the middle of the pack among
physicians. When results were broken down by age group, however, infectious
disease specialists between 41 and 50 years of age rated themselves as
healthier than those in their 30s (4.21 vs 3.97) -- also higher than the
average physician in this age group (4.13).




How Many Infectious Disease Specialists Are Overweight?




According to statistics from the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC), in 2008 40% of
US men were overweight and 32% were obese.[8] As for physicians in
general, a 2004 study[9] found that 38% of male physicians were
overweight and 8% were obese
. The Medscape survey suggests an
improvement in the average physicians' weight, and infectious disease
specialists fared slightly better than their peers. Approximately 30.4% of
infectious disease specialists reported being overweight, in contrast to the
32.9% average of all physicians who responded to the survey. About 4.0% of
infectious disease specialists responded that they were obese, which was better
than the 5.6% average reported among all physician respondents. Of note,
physicians' own body weight may influence how they talk to their patients about
weight. A 2012 study in Obesity reported that physicians with a normal
body mass index were more likely to engage their obese patients in weight-loss
discussions than were overweight or obese physicians (30% vs 18%).[10]
In a Medscape discussion
on overweight physicians
, a primary care physician wrote, "We are all
fallible. Physicians need to address this directly when communicating with
their patients -- why they choose to remain fat or to smoke -- so they can be
credible."




How Often Do Infectious Disease Specialists Exercise?




According to the CDC, between 1999 and 2009 the percentage
of men aged 18 years or older who met the 2008 federal aerobic activity and
muscle-strengthening guidelines increased from 19% to 22%.[8] These
guidelines recommend moderate to vigorous aerobic activity performed in
episodes of at least 10 minutes, and preferably spread throughout the week.
Adults should also do muscle-strengthening activities that are moderate or high
intensity and involve all major muscle groups on 2 or more days a week.
According to the Medscape survey, the older they are, the more infectious
disease specialists exercise, which is a trend seen among all physicians.

Whether this higher rate among older physicians is a matter of free time or
consciousness of aging cannot be determined from this survey. Almost 70% of
infectious disease specialists in their 30s reported that they exercised once a
week or less. Those numbers were flipped, however, for older physicians: Among
infectious disease specialists aged 51-60 years, 60% reported exercising 2 or
more times a week, and 76% of those aged 61-70 years exercised at the same
rate.




What Types of Exercise Do Infectious Disease Specialists
Engage in Most?




Over 73% of infectious disease specialists and 71% of all
physicians engaged in aerobic activities as their primary form of exercise
.
Weight training came in a distant second, with about 22% choosing it as their
favorite physical activity. Seventeen percent of infectious disease
specialists enjoy yoga, tai chi, or other Eastern practices, which was a little
more than the 15% of all physicians who do so
. Among write-in responses,
some infectious disease specialists specified skateboarding, and others said
that they did Power 90 Extreme (P90X), a workout that emphasizes intense
periodic cross-training.




Do Infectious Disease Specialists Smoke?




Although the national quit rate has increased slightly over
the past few years, according to a 2011 Harris Interactive poll, 18% of Americans still smoke.[11]
Among nonsmokers, the physicians who answered our survey -- including
infectious disease specialists -- led the national pack: A little under 1% of infectious disease
specialists said that they smoked, and about 4.4% were ex-smokers.




How Often Do Infectious Disease Specialists Drink Alcohol?




As reported in a 2010 Gallup poll, 67% of US adults drink
alcohol, a rate that has been "remarkably stable" since this began to
be tracked in 1939
.[12] According to the Medscape survey,
infectious disease specialists were just a little above the national average
and their peers; about 69% reported that they drank, and about 31% did not
drink at all
. Over one half, however, reported having fewer than 1 drink
per day, and approximately 13% reported having 1-2 drinks per day. A little over
3% of infectious disease specialists responded that they consumed more than 2
drinks daily.




How Do Infectious Disease Specialists Gauge the State of
Their Personal Finances?




As of December 2011, a Gallup poll reported that 52.5% of
Americans considered themselves to be thriving, 43.7% were struggling, and 3.7%
were suffering
.[13] In contrast, our
Medscape survey indicates that many infectious disease specialists perceive
themselves as being on secure financial footing. Over 68% of infectious
disease specialists in practice said that they had adequate or more than
adequate savings for their age and stage of life
. All of those who were
retired also reported having adequate or more than adequate savings. It should
be noted, however, that this finding may reflect the small number of
respondents in this older age group.




Are Infectious Disease Specialists Religious/Spiritual?




According to a 2008
Pew report, 88% of Americans believe in God or a universal spirit.
[14]
In our Medscape poll, instead of asking about specific religious affiliations,
we wanted to know whether physicians have a spiritual belief, regardless of
active participation. Just under three quarters of infectious disease
specialists reported that they have religious or spiritual belief, and about
39% of them actively practice their faith. Infectious disease specialists were
slightly less religious than their peers, 83% of whom reported that they had
religious beliefs.
Of note, in our survey, men and women differed
little in terms of having or not having a belief system and actively or not
actively practicing
. In the Pew report, however, men were
significantly more likely than women to claim no religious affiliation: nearly
20% vs roughly 13%, respectively.




What Would Infectious Disease Specialists Do if They Were
Told They Had a Terminal Illness?




In a 2011 poll by National Journal and the Regence
Foundation,[15] 71% of the
general population felt that quality of life was more important than length of
life, 23% felt it was important to extend life with every intervention
available
, and only 6% didn't know or didn't answer the question. About
three quarters of infectious disease specialists chose palliative care and
quality of life over aggressive treatment in all age groups, with the exception
of those in their 40s. This group was more uncertain, and there was an increase
in those who would choose aggressive treatment. When the responses were
filtered by religious or spiritual belief, 9% of infectious disease
specialists with no beliefs wanted aggressive treatment. Nearly 17% of those
who actively practice their religion answered that they would choose to be
treated aggressively.




Do Infectious Disease Specialists Use Social Media?




Unlike other older physicians, those in infectious disease
were as likely to use social media as those in the youngest age groups in this
survey. In fact, infectious disease specialists in their 60s were heavier
users of Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter than those in their 50s.




How Many US Infectious Disease Specialists Are Citizens, and
How Many Came From Other Countries?




Approximately 58% of the infectious disease specialists
who answered Medscape's questions about citizenship were born in the United
States, and about 10% came here as children
. About 32% came to the United
States as adults -- a proportion that is much lower than the rate of 26.3% for
physicians overall that the Migration Policy Institute reported in 2007. In
this report, Asia was the origin of
the greatest proportion of foreign-born physicians -- around 22% -- followed by
Europe/Canada/Oceania at about 16%. Africa contributed about 12%, and Latin
America 6%.
[16]




What Cars Do Infectious Disease Specialists Drive?




In 2011, the top 3 highest-selling cars in the United States
were made by non-US companies: Toyota, Nissan, and Honda, with Ford coming
in fourth
.[17] Infectious disease specialists who answered the
Medscape survey also listed foreign-made cars as their top choices: Honda
(19%), Toyota (15%), and Lexus and Mercedes-Benz (both with 8%). Audi came in
sixth
. US automaker Ford didn't show up until eighth place and was chosen
by only about 5% of infectious disease specialists.




What Are Infectious Disease Specialists' Favorite Nonmedical
Mobile Apps?




Author affiliation: Carol Peckham, Director of Editorial
Development, Medscape from WebMD




Disclosure: Carol Peckham has disclosed no relevant
financial relationships.




Author affiliation: Mindy Hung, Freelance writer




Disclosure: Mindy Hung has disclosed no relevant financial
relationships.







2012年3月22日 星期四

Low Vitamin D Linked to High IgE, Need for Steroids in Asthma

[補充維他命D可能會減少氣喘嚴重度]

Kate Johnson



March 22, 2012 (Orlando, Florida) — Low serum vitamin D levels in children with asthma are associated with higher immunoglobulin (Ig)E levels and poorer response to inhaled corticosteroids, according to a study reported here at the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI) 2012 Annual Meeting.


"Our study suggests that in children there is a window of opportunity to reverse allergic sensitization with vitamin D supplementation,"  said Elena Goleva, PhD, from the Department of Pediatrics at the National Jewish Health in Denver, Colorado.


The study involved 103 people with asthma. Mean serum vitamin D levels were 22 ng/mL for children (n = 53) and 17 ng/mL for adults (n = 50); 47.6% of the cohort was deficient in vitamin D (serum levels below 20 ng/mL).


The researchers found an inverse relation between serum IgE levels and vitamin D in children (P = .006) but not in adults (P = .1693), and an inverse relation between inhaled corticosteroid dose and serum vitamin D levels in children but not adults.


Multivariate regression showed positive correlations between vitamin D levels and the expression of several genes indicative of steroid response — Cyp24a (cytochrome P450, family 24, subfamily a) in children (P = .0084) but not adults, and LL-37 in both children (P = .0006) and adults (P = .0067).


In vitro results also showed that the expression of Cyp24a correlated with the suppression of both interleukin-13 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha by dexamethasone in children (P = .0094 and P = .05, respectively) but not in adults.


Vitamin D Supplementation Debated


"We suggest that supplementation with vitamin D should be done in patients with asthma, both adults and children, to lower steroid requirement and improve steroid response," said Dr. Goleva.


"They jumped to a lot of conclusions. It didn't seem that their data were that strong for making a recommendation as far as supplementation," said a meeting attendee, a researcher with a PhD in nutrition science who asked that her name not be used. "There's still a lot to learn about vitamin D. It is very potent. Modest supplementation might be fine, but some people are giving large doses and we don't know what effect that could have. It could have some negative effects."


Although he did not hear the presentation, Audreesh Banerjee, MD, from the airways biology initiative in the pulmonary, allergy, and critical care medicine division at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, said that if deficiency in vitamin D increases steroid requirements, there is a possibility that supplementation would decrease steroid needs.


"We've been looking for a long time for steroid-sparing agents. It's not clear that vitamin D would do that, but it could be one strategy, especially if you're really having to go up to high doses of steroids," he told Medscape Medical News.


However, Dr. Banerjee urged caution, because the story of vitamin D and asthma/allergy is still evolving. "Every good scientist and clinician is also a skeptic, so we've got to make sure we see the evidence."


Dr. Goleva and Dr. Banerjee have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI) 2012 Annual Meeting: Abstract 483. Presented March 4, 2012.



2012年3月21日 星期三

生活簡單就是享受



[這裡的想法未免太消極了些。一個人活在社會中還是要有互動,有機會就互相幫忙、雪中送炭,有能力就做對人有助益的事;對有成就的人不吝出聲給予讚賞、祝福、與鼓勵;有人影響力侷限在鄰近的人群,我們也不忽視他們給這些人群帶來的愉悅及將來的可能發展。]




生活簡單就是享受--從奢華到簡單




 戴勝益口述(王品集團董事長)




  歲看智力、二十看學歷、三十看能力、四 十看經歷、五十看財力、六十看體力、七 十看病歷、八十看黃曆。




 讓你的生活之舟,只承載你所需要的東西,




例如你只要一個樸素的家和一種單純的喜悅,一個或兩個值得交的朋友,一些你愛或是愛你的人,剛好足夠的食物和衣服......




「現代的文明已走到了盡頭,迷幻的街景也終究成空,心靈在睡夢中覺醒,精神正尋求自己的出路。新儉樸運動,成了後現代的 新風尚。」




中央大學哲學研究所教授王邦雄的這段話一語道破現代人物慾橫流的通病,更點醒了我。




以前,我聘有服裝設計師,每季付七萬五當作詢問費,每季大採購一次,當然一定是進名牌店買當季服裝,追逐流行。




還有司機幫我開賓士車,我加入扶輪社,為了要能跟人評比,所有大家想得到的貴公子奢侈作為與行頭,我一樣也不少。然而,這件事徹底地改變了我。




一位在王品廚房打工的五十幾歲洗碗婦女,每天賺四百元,下了班背著布袋,沿街撿鋁罐維生,為了撿路中央的一個鋁 罐,居然被卡車撞死,這給我很大的震憾。




試想同樣在一家公司,有人一天賺四百元,還被卡車撞死,而我卻是極盡奢華。




大約在同時,我接觸到愛琳詹姆絲所寫的 《生活簡單就是享受》(Simplify
Your Life
時,著實給我自己的人生找到一個新方 向,原來生活可以如此簡單。




既然立意要跟著這本書的腳步走,第一步就是先換車。辭掉司機,把賓士換成
CEFIRO 2000
;由於長期奔走在台北、台中兩地,乾脆坐火車,因此身上永遠有一大疊車票。




第二步少坐車,車程三十分鐘以上,才搭捷運或計程車,不然一律用走的。




第三步換衣服,把名牌衣服收起來,現在身上穿的襯衫,三件一千元,一次買個21件; 以前領帶平均一條四千元,大概擁有50條, 現在4條一千元,一次買個30條, 這很符合「生活簡單就是享受」的原則- 大量採購,一次買足,就可節省頻跑商店的時間。




還有絕不過人家在過的生活!尤其看電視!根據調查「看電視時間跟成就成反比」,任電視擺布二個小時,想必是沒有主見,沒有安排好自己時間的人,換言之也許是沒有目標。[有些電視節目可以讓我學到新知哦]




要樂在工作,就像書裡說的,要把嗜好融入工作,因此我的目標:遊百國、開百店及登百岳,不只我在做,也號召公司裡志同道合的人一起來做。




另外,要學著每天大笑一次,剛開始笑不出來,可以先假笑, 漸漸就會懂得去笑,笑開懷的感覺會互相感染,而且開會時最好脫掉西裝,「虎皮會有虎威」,脫掉那層虎皮後,物質上變 easy 似乎也帶動心靈的easy




以前我在乎別人怎麼看,也很喜歡影響別人的想法。如果有人來哭訴自己的感情遇到 什麼波折,我不僅當場給意見,還很雞婆地打電話問人家有沒有照著做。




結果忙碌混亂的滿足感充斥生活中,卻常有種「好心卻被雷打」的失落感;現在我知道,關心有很多方法,不能用自己的價值觀去強加在別人身上。




同時,要懂得說不,要求的人太多,如果每一次都做,只是忙忙碌碌做別人的事,實在沒有意義。也許剛開始的「不」字,讓雙方都不太習慣,但久了,這就是我的風格,也不會有人覺得你冷漠無情。這 本書裡提到一個有趣方法: 麼事也不做。




也許一天發呆個三、四個鐘 頭,真的不錯,不是完全放空冥想,而是放下手邊的工作,走路也好,坐在位子上 也好,有時靈感就會莫名其妙的跑出來。




那些無解惱人的問題,頓時靈光乍現,得到答案。




過,這也發生了一個小笑話。




以前還是小公司時,我很憂心地坐在辦公室 裡,皺眉認真地想怎麼解決問題才好,同事總會問說:「老闆,你幹麼坐在位子上發呆?」




現在公司變大了,坐在位子上發呆,同事卻 說:「老闆,你好認真,想公司的未來 呀?」




生活簡單就是享受》一書裡總共介紹一百招 讓生活簡單,細數一下,我已經做了28招, 其中「保持旅行的習慣」,「每年度假一 次」是最徹底的執行。




度假一定帶著家 ,旅行隨時可走,我想每天我們上班下 班,做很規律的事情,如果現在要你回想一下 三月十日  
三月二十日 ,你做了什麼?




相信你什麼都記不起來,因為每天都一樣, 但如果那段時間是去衣索比亞旅行,你一 定會記得吧。----[電腦很方便,養成寫日記、留下digital
photo journal的習慣吧
]




同的環境,會產生不同的刺激,才會有不 同的方法去思考;旅 行,也是可以讓你找到自我的有效方法之 一。




不過,出國旅行千萬不要買禮物,因為不患寡,患不均,過去每每旅行回來的禮物,總有人被遺忘,或者不喜歡你送的禮 物,反而大傷感情。因此,現在我出國都簡便輕裝,絕不買禮物,也省卻煩惱買什麼送人的時間。




生活可以簡單,但要做到「享受」這份簡單,並不太容易。




這本書的作者愛琳花了三年時間, 成功地簡化自己的生活,又回歸「享受生活」的世界,而我也整整花了兩年的時間去適應。




以前很喜歡跟人比來比去,不喜歡被打敗的感覺。記得一次在經建會開完會後,所有 企業主在門口一排的黑頭車等著接送,有老闆問到:「戴董,你的車那一部?」我只是笑笑回說,「我坐計程車啦!」現在,我領悟到:「我退出戰局了呀!」




不再為別人而活,不再在意別人的眼光, 就像書序引述老 子的話「自勝者強」但「知足者富」;克制我心狂野,才是真正的強者,回歸內在的純真,才是真正的富有。




對於別人的不理會,我一笑置之,至於別人的戰場,又何必去插一腳。




簡單幾步做到『生活簡單就是享受』:住小房子吧!否則你會疲於打掃房子。




衣櫥不要太大,大了就想多買衣服。




關掉電視吧!因為它占掉我們太多時問了。




不要電話一響,就反射式地急著接。




 檢討你的購物習慣,不要為買而買




 





2012年3月19日 星期一

只有綠營先改頭換面、、、、、



[只有綠營先改頭換面




黑暗的台灣才有出現曙光的一天




北社前副社長王美琇女士今天在自由時報刊出的專論




頗值得大家參考]




 




協尋民進黨主席




王美琇




這真是一個令人失望的黨。若不是因為它和台灣的命運息息相關,真的很想掉頭離去,看都不想再看它一眼。雖然,它確實比那個有萬惡黨產、善於偽裝和欺騙人民的爛黨好得多,也不會一直想把台灣推向中國黑洞。但這個黨,就是內鬥內行、外鬥外行,所以讓人失望。




我想你知道,我說的就是民進黨。如果把這個黨拆開來看,裡面戰將英才比比皆是。很像一塊塊美麗的積木,可是無論如何,就是無法組合成一個堅實壯麗的城堡。這是怎麼回事?說穿了,就是私心、就是派系傾軋惡鬥。




醜話先講在前面。挑釁?你誤會了。我只是揚起眉峰,一如義大利導演費里尼揚起眉峰,然後,眉峰下,有一個故事正要開展……




 




人們停止恩怨情仇




我要說的故事,第一句話是︱︱歷史應該要翻過新的一頁了。




呂秀蓮前副總統說,不是世代交替,是世代經驗傳承。我完全同意。但不同的世代,應該有不同的舞台。律師世代和美麗島世代或許該退出第一線舞台了。並不是否定這些前輩們的經驗和對歷史的貢獻,相反的,有他們才有今天的民進黨和台灣的民主之路。他們建構了民進黨的魂魄骨架和台灣的進步文明。有這些人的奉獻與舖路,才成就了後輩人才繼續前進。




所謂「站在巨人的肩膀上」,就是這個意思。然而,這些巨人們,應去做一個讓人尊敬的大老,而不是讓人討厭的老大。




因為,這些巨人們之間的恩恩怨怨,已經非常明顯且嚴重地削弱了民進黨的整體戰力,以及阻絕了新世代挺身承擔更多責任與為黨開創新局的勇氣。因為,這些巨人們不願意放手,繼續恩怨情仇,讓新世代不知所措,有時則感到心灰意冷。




巨人們,請放下私心、停止惡鬥吧。不然這個黨沒有希望。巨人們,請將寶貴經驗和智慧傳承下去,做為後輩的肩膀,讓他們站在肩膀上,繼續前進。




前言說完。接著,我要進入故事的主題:協尋民進黨主席。




 




民進黨主席條件說




目前的民進黨,很像一個老字號的商品。第一代、第二代的產品已經推出太久而逐漸失去市場魅力,如果沒有繼續研發推出第三代產品,可能會被市場淘汰。蔡英文算是第三代產品,讓市場感到新鮮和驚艷,重新刷亮老字號的招牌。雖然這次沒有打勝仗,但並不表示這個「市場概念」是錯誤的,只是「市場戰略」有很大的改進空間。




國民黨已開始推出第三代、第四代產品了,民進黨卻彷彿又要回到第二代產品的「內戰」而爭論不休,未來還有市場爭奪戰的希望嗎?很不樂觀。所以,我願意干冒眾怒,提出對民進黨第三代產品,也就是新任民進黨黨主席的條件期許和淺見。




一、蔡英文時代是「時勢造英雄」,再過來必須是「英雄造時勢」。而且不是一個英雄,最好是「一群英雄」來創造時勢。一如明治維新時期的群雄立國。期待有一群新世代,願意共同承擔歷史責任,並推出其中一位當「領頭羊」。唯有展現新世代的群體力量,才能整個翻轉民進黨的「面貌」,呈現出新的視野和輪廓。




二、民進黨主席是民進黨的「臉」。每天必須面對媒體,這張「臉」會形成對民進黨的「總體印象」。所以這張臉、也就是第三代產品,最好是「清新和有信賴感」,這對民進黨的形象才有「加分和外擴」效果。




三、有強化民進黨處理國際事務的能力。此次美中兩國嚴重干涉台灣大選,以及美牛瘦肉精事件,皆令國人震驚。顯見台灣政治已不只是「國內政治」,應該重估台灣的國家安全戰略。民進黨領導人必須有國際觀和能力,處理棘手的國際問題,包括美、中、日關係等。




四、能將扁政府的卸任政務官、國安團隊,以及知識力、社會力帶進民進黨,與民進黨內菁英組成強而有力的影子內閣,展開準執政團隊的監督戰,強化民眾對民進黨重新執政的信心。




五、有高度統合力和協調力,能把民進黨的力量做最有效的整合。尤其是立法院和執政縣市的僅存優勢,應該以「團塊作戰」的思考整合戰力,形塑民進黨的整體「社會形象」。例如「美牛案」就是一個適合「團塊作戰」的議題。




六、落實基層經營和黨員力量的重新整頓。十六萬名黨員是民進黨最堅強的基本部隊,也是理念堅定的台灣守護者。必須讓這群尖兵充分發揮群體力量,尤其應訓練其成為未來投開票所的「監票、固票和催票」核心幹部。




 




歷史將翻過新的一頁




至於代理黨主席陳菊市長,是我非常敬重的前輩。但我認為她有市長重任在身,不宜投入下任主席選舉。高雄市長和黨主席都很重要,兼任將無法兼顧,最後兩邊失守。所以下任黨主席必須專任。




故事已經到了終點。雖然會顧人怨,我還是必須說,民進黨內的「巨人們」,是該結束世代競爭的恩怨情仇了。請你們優雅地退出第一線舞台,留下令人懷念的美麗身影。讓第三代新產品、新戰力上場吧。讓你們的智慧經驗傳承下去,讓新世代站在巨人的肩膀上,勇敢地承擔起重任,為民進黨、為台灣拚出一條活路吧。




民進黨需要有新的力量和一群新世代的英雄們,站出來承接重大的歷史使命,以及翻轉台灣的命運!




歷史即將翻過新的一頁。也許有人黯然神傷,但更有人期待新的氣象。協尋民進黨主席。是的。我在等待,春雷乍響後,第一葉綻放的新綠。




 




2012/3/18自由時報,星期專論,作者王美琇,專欄作家)